The top conversations on APViewpoint last week were started by Larry Swedroe, Adam Butler and Bob Veres. They generated thoughtful discussion with wide ranging opinions on: factor-based approaches to investing; factor investing research methodologies; and a new tool to visualize retirement planning.
While it is not yet resolved whether the low-volatility and low-beta anomalies can be fully explained by exposures to other well-known factors, their popularity certainly has changed the valuation metrics of low-volatility stocks. At the very least, this should raise a flag of caution for investors who have been enticed by the historical data.
Smart beta. Empirical finance. Evidence-based investing. These terms, which were in the periphery of the investment vernacular just 10 years ago, have become the investment world’s most popular memes today. Why?
Low-vol strategies have attracted a lot of attention, in part because they portend to offer investors a free lunch – higher returns with lower volatility. But they carry hidden risks that every investor must understand.
The top conversations on APViewpoint last week were started by thought leaders Joe Tomlinson, Larry Swedroe and Dan Solin. They generated thoughtful discussion with wide ranging opinions on: how variable withdrawals improve retirement outcomes; whether high-dividend strategies add value; and the future of the advisory business.
Given the heightened interest in dividend strategies, I’ll take a look at how some of the leading providers of actively managed dividend-based strategies have performed.