The AI Split Between U.S. Dollar and Euro Investment Grade

The AI Split Between U.S. Dollar and Euro Investment Grade

Key takeaways

  • A broader funding mix offers a cleaner test of supply technicals in the U.S. dollar (USD) market. As hyperscalers increasingly finance AI capex across multiple currencies, the relative performance of their USD and euro-denominated (EUR) bonds provides a useful lens through which to isolate the technical effects of the much larger wave of dollar issuance.
  • Relative performance points to a USD supply overhang. Issuer-matched comparisons show hyperscaler bonds have been less volatile in EUR relative to USD. Given largely identical underlying credit fundamentals, the divergence suggests that supply pressure and investor fatigue have been more pronounced in the dollar market.
  • The implications extend beyond a simple currency relative-value trade. In USD investment grade, hyperscalers are now large enough to influence both index-level returns and bond-level dispersion. AI-related issuance is increasingly emerging as a distinct risk factor within the asset class, one that investors should monitor across issuers, yield curves, and benchmark indices.

The AI capital expenditure cycle remains solidly on track to eclipse the telecom boom of the late 1990s and become the largest investment cycle since the railway buildout of the 19th century in inflation-adjusted terms. This year alone, AI-related issuers accounted for six of the eight non-financial U.S. investment grade (IG) companies that raised more than $20 billion in the USD corporate bond market. Yet the ultimate scale of the buildout remains deeply uncertain. Bloomberg consensus forecasts imply that hyperscaler capital spending alone will surpass $1 trillion per year from 2027 onward, with no clear signs of moderation.

In fact, capital needs have been so large for the hyperscalers that they started to diversify their debt issuance into a range of foreign currencies. While the most non-USD issuance has still taken place in the EUR market, as a group, these firms have also tapped primary markets in Canada, the UK, Japan, and Switzerland, albeit to varying degrees.

Beyond just the balance sheet re-leveraging impulse that is already widely acknowledged, large issuance figures have led to technical factors becoming an increasingly important driver of relative performance within the AI ecosystem on both sides of the Atlantic.

Figure 1 shows that 2026 year-to-date net supply of index eligible AI hyperscaler debt stands at $120 billion and €22 billion, in the USD and EUR corporate IG indices, respectively.

Figure 1: Hyperscaler USD IG index-eligible net supply year-to-date has reached nearly $120 billion More Info

That said, while 2026 has been a record net supply year in both markets for these firms, it has been far more pronounced for USD denominated bonds. Collectively, hyperscalers now account for nearly 5% of the USD IG index vs. just 1.2% for the EUR IG market (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: Hyperscalers now constitute 5% of the USD IG index vs. just 1.2% in Europe More Info

See more: AI’s New Frontier: The Transformation of Investment-Grade Credit