What Does the Tariff Pause Mean for Markets?

After sparking the steepest plunge in financial markets since the global pandemic five years ago, President Donald Trump’s administration made another dramatic pivot in its trade war strategy on April 9: It paused for 90 days the “reciprocal” tariffs that had been in effect for less than 24 hours. Though markets quickly rallied on the news, uncertainty remains and, as such, volatility is expected to continue.

Is this news bullish or bearish?

With the S&P 500 index bouncing 9.5% on April 9 – its best daily return since October 2008 – the market signaled a sense of relief, even though the tariff against China was escalated to a punitive 125% and a 10% tariff remains in place on all other trading partners for 90 days, to allow for negotiations. With these changes, we estimate that the US weighted average tariff rate will remain at approximately 22.5% – still the highest in more than 100 years.

This is a textbook illustration of how expectations can change over a short period of time. Prior to the past two months, the idea that 10% tariffs could be cause for relief would have seemed unbelievable. But after two months of tariff escalation, the Trump administration’s decision to take an off-ramp, again, regarding every country except China, is certainly a better scenario for businesses as well as investors, as compared to the alternative of fighting a trade war with essentially the entire world. Better, though far from great; the quicker the trade war between the world’s two superpowers ends, the less economic dislocation there will be for everyone.

What to keep an eye on

It will be crucial to watch what happens with the various bilateral trade negotiations taking place along parallel tracks. We see potential for a sizable number of negotiated trade deals during the 90-day pause, enabling tariff reductions on both sides; however, it is a question of how much economic damage occurs first. Until there is tangible evidence that at least some talks are making progress, uncertainty will remain high.

As it relates to China, ultimately there will also need to be a negotiated solution, though the political dynamics are particularly difficult in this case. It may come down to whether the two leaders – Trump and Xi Jinping – are willing to reach a deal.