The Tariff Tug-of-War: Balancing Economic Growth and Trade Relations

The first trade skirmish of the second Trump administration has reverberated through global markets, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty in international trade relations. The administration has postponed the imposition of 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico until 1 March, while the 10% increase on Chinese goods has taken effect, signaling a more aggressive stance toward China that is likely to persist.

If fully implemented, we estimate the tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China could raise U.S. inflation by 0.8 percentage points and reduce growth by 1.2 points in the first year. In contrast, if only Chinese tariffs are implemented, the economic effects on the U.S. would likely be much more muted: Inflation could rise by roughly 0.2 percentage points, with a similarly sized impact on growth. The direct drag on growth from tariffs on Canada and Mexico is likely to be higher.

These risks complicate the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions as it strives for price stability while maximizing employment. A near-term rise in inflation would tend to delay further interest rate cuts, while potential economic slowdowns would suggest faster cuts and possibly a lower destination for the policy rate. Overall, we think the combination of elevated post-pandemic inflation and the strength of the U.S. economy will likely keep the Fed on hold for now.

Tariff strategy

We believe the Trump administration is determined to use tariffs not only to try to alter global trade and raise government revenues, but also to pressure countries on broader U.S. demands, including an accelerated review of the U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) and NATO defense spending requirements.

However, we believe the 40-year-old North American free trade bloc ultimately will survive, as the focus of tariff and trade policy will likely remain on China and other non-USMCA countries that run serial trade surpluses with the U.S. We believe these countries – including Germany and other European states, as well as Japan and Vietnam – should prepare for more U.S. policy volatility.

We expect to gain further insight into the details of future trade actions on 1 April, the deadline for several deliverables detailed in Trump’s executive order on trade.