A quiet but profound pivot is underway in the sustainable investing space – a pivot that, in our view, will reshape markets and elevate fixed income to a place of prominence within the environmental, social and governance (ESG) field.
When the United Nations Global Compact launched its concept of ESG investing in 2004, the focus was decidedly on the action and tactics that international investors (especially asset management firms) could undertake as equity owners to influence the behavior of corporations in relation to sustainability issues.
This critical framing, with a related emphasis on the financial materiality of a range of ESG issues, delivered its intended consequence – moving sustainable investing beyond purely norms-based ethical approaches (i.e., negative screening and potentially sacrificing returns) and toward mainstream understanding and adoption.
To date, however, equities have received the lion’s share of attention and engagement from investors. The reasons, when comparing equities with other assets, include a much larger body of ESG research, numerous benchmarks and indexes, and clearer connections to corporate engagement.
We believe this is about to change, ushering in a possible “ESG New Normal” with fixed income at the core of the sustainable investing universe that could eventually expand ESG-related borrowing from billions of dollars annually to the trillions needed to safeguard a country or company’s creditworthiness over the long term.
So, what are the “straws in the wind” that lead us to this conclusion?
First, we witness the growing recognition by many in the market that ESG issues present material credit risk – with respect to both corporate and sovereign debt. Certainly, PIMCO’s integration of ESG credit analysis across the entire investment universe reflects the understanding that investors, like any lender, cannot ignore sustainability and governance issues that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay its debt. For example, our early analysis of corruption allegations against South Africa’s president in 2015 resulted in an active call to reduce exposure to the country.
The materiality of ESG issues in relation to credit risk follows naturally from the growing body of evidence demonstrating, for example, that companies that effectively manage and integrate sustainability issues realize a range of competitive benefits – including resource and cost efficiencies, productivity gains, new revenue and product opportunities, and reputation benefits. As Breckinridge Capital Advisors notes, “A company with operations that rely on natural resources is better placed to safeguard its reputation, reduce future costs and avoid a ratings downgrade by remaining committed to environmental protection in both word and action.”1
Second, on both the product innovation and sourcing side, fixed income ESG is accelerating. Numerous ESG bond funds have been launched – or are in the works – by both mainstream institutions and boutique houses.
And in the green bond space, supply is expected to increase more than 60% this year to $250 billion, surpassing 2017’s record $155 billion, according to Bloomberg. It is worth noting that corporate, government and asset-backed categories all saw nearly equal issuance growth in 2017. Of course, these encouraging growth estimates must be understood vis-à-vis the size of the world’s total bond market – nearly $100 trillion.
Meanwhile, PIMCO engagement and discussions with both corporates and sovereigns suggest we are on the cusp of a sea change in social bond securities related to issues such as water access, sanitation, gender, health and other social-related infrastructure areas (e.g., food distribution, transport). In this regard, it is worth noting the recent, declared interest by development banks and agencies in working with private finance and institutional investors – often for the first time – to source deals and co-invest.
Third, and closely related to the previous point, the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are exciting interest and passion as an overarching ESG framework that can guide investments to achieve returns while delivering positive societal impact. To be sure, the 17 SDGs – adopted unanimously by all 193 U.N. member states in 2016 – can be seen as a comprehensive and thorough elaboration of ESG, with the added benefit of targets and even indicators.
Moreover, and crucially, the U.N. estimates that in order to achieve the SDGs by 2030, between $3 trillion to $5 trillion annually will be required, with the majority of this investment needing to come from the private sector. The long-term nature of the SDGs – with its arc to 2030 – and the fact that much of the financing, especially on the sovereign side (but not only), will need to relate to long-horizon social and environmental projects and investment means that debt instruments could be ideally suited.
Thus, we see the prospect of a blossoming market in “SDG bonds” by sovereigns, development banks and companies – either general in nature, or thematically targeting a specific goal or goals. Witness, for example, the Asian Development Bank’s launch of a gender bond in late 2017.
Even now, the U.N. Global Compact is developing a “Blueprint for SDG Bonds,” which it plans to launch in September 2018 during the U.N. General Assembly. The blueprint will offer guidance to companies, investors, sovereigns and municipals on definitions, development and impact measurement.
In many ways, the fixed income market is uniquely suited to both benefit from and provide finance for ESG-related efforts. Issuers often return to the bond market – unlike the stock market – when they refinance old debt or seek new funding. This gives bond investors a unique opportunity to identify risks, engage issuers and build relationships that can influence change. We believe that ESG investing is not only about partnering with issuers who already demonstrate a deeply integrated approach rel="noopener noreferrer" to ESG, but also engaging with those who want to improve their own initiatives and are willing to work with lenders to achieve their goals.
Moreover, long-term thinking is a critical feature of ESG and is well-aligned with bond investors, specifically at PIMCO where the cornerstone of our investment process is to identify risks and opportunities in markets over a three- to five-year period.
We believe that incorporating ESG analysis into fixed income portfolios has the potential to deliver attractive long-term returns while also having a positive impact. It doesn’t need to be an “either/or” proposition, and the market is waking up to that reality.
PIMCO’s sustainability initiative is dedicated to firmwide integration of ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles, and our investment process emphasizes careful analysis of the broad secular trends at the core of long-term sustainability.
1 Breckinridge Capital Advisors, White Paper, “ESG Integration in Corporate Fixed Income,” January 2015
DISCLOSURES
Socially responsible investing is qualitative and subjective by nature, and there is no guarantee that the criteria utilized, or judgment exercised, by PIMCO will reflect the beliefs or values of any one particular investor. Information regarding responsible practices is obtained through voluntary or third-party reporting, which may not be accurate or complete, and PIMCO is dependent on such information to evaluate a company’s commitment to, or implementation of, responsible practices. Socially responsible norms differ by region. There is no assurance that the socially responsible investing strategy and techniques employed will be successful. Past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future results.
Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and the current low interest rate environment increases this risk. Current reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.
This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.
© PIMCO
© PIMCO
Read more commentaries by PIMCO
