Shutdown

by Jeffrey Saut of Raymond James, 1/25/18

“It’s my party, and I’ll cry if I want to

Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you”

... Lesley Gore, “It’s My Party,” 1963, (It's My Party)

The year was 1963, the singer was Lesley Gore, and the song was “It’s My Party.” Clearly, that song seems appropriate given the government shutdown over the weekend. Indeed, “It’s My Party” and the blame rests with both parties in the political equation. Said song is also appropriate given that Saturday was President Trump’s one-year presidential “birthday party!” As Axios’ Mike Allen wrote, “The House was standing by in case a 1:00 a.m. vote was needed. One member told me at 8 a.m.: ‘Everybody’s grumpy, their families want to kill them, and nobody knows anything.’" Not to be outdone, Fox TV’s Jesse Watters stated on the show “The Five,” "This country’s run by imbeciles. We're $20 trillion in debt. We do this every single year." Nevertheless, a shutdown is a shutdown is a shutdown, and how the stock market reacts to it should be determined by how long the shutdown lasts. If it is short, there should be a de minimis impact on stocks. If it is drawn-out, however, investor confidence could be impacted with a concurrent headwind for equities. As for us, our sense is the shutdown will be short because of the negative feedback for ALL politicians as they face the upcoming midterm elections.

So last Wednesday we concluded our comments on Neil Cavuto’s “Coast to Coast” Fox TV show by noting, “We worked in the D.C. Beltway years ago, but still have pretty good contacts on Capitol Hill. And as of Tuesday night we were told that there were not enough votes to prevent a government shutdown.” B-i-n-g-o... our contacts got it dead right as the government did shut down at midnight last Friday. Now the history of government shutdowns is that they tend to be short. The longest took place between 12/15/95 and 1/6/96, lasting 21 days. The shortest, at only one day, occurred in 1982, 1984, 1986, and 1987. The average decline during the shutdown for the S&P 500 (SPX/2810.30) was -0.6%, the median decline was 0.0%, with a positive percentage for the SPX of 44.4% of the 18 shutdowns going back to 1976.

So how is the shutdown going to affect the economy? Well according to Goldman Sachs’ Alec Phillips:

A shutdown would have a modest economic impact, provided it does not last very long. We estimate that each week of shutdown would reduce real GDP growth in Q1 by 0.2 (percentage points, quarter over quarter) annualized. The effects would be reversed the next quarter, however. Shutdowns have also tended to have modest effects on financial markets. Most of the notable shutdowns over the last few decades coincided with debt limit deadlines. Even so, those led to only modest and temporary declines in equities and even smaller effects in Treasury yields and the dollar. With the debt limit deadline farther away, we would expect a muted initial reaction in financial markets to a shutdown.

Consequently, this shutdown should be short and should not affect our short-term market call in that stocks should trade higher into February, where our models suggest the first point of downside vulnerability.

Moving on, irrespective of the shutdown, there is an acceleration in synchronized global growth, most notably in China. That acceleration is causing the world’s GDP growth estimates to ratchet upward. Here in our country, 1Q18 GDP growth of 3.0% or more seems increasingly likely, which would make it four 3% GDP growth quarters in a row. Given that, and the corporate tax cuts, is it any wonder earnings estimates for the S&P 500 are moving up? Indeed, bottom-up (operating) earnings estimates for 4Q17 have improved to a solid +6.9% year-over-year. Moreover, those same earnings estimates have leaped to $150 for all of 2018, with one bulge-bracket investment bank estimating $157. If that estimate is correct, it implies the S&P 500 is trading at 17.9x forward earnings (2810÷ $157=17.9).