The Big Beautiful Bill: Stimulus Now, Tightening Later

While official estimates remain fluid and subject to change, our preliminary analysis at the time of this writing suggests that the House Reconciliation Proposal could significantly increase the national debt over the next decade. In addition to the continuation and expansion of provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the Ways and Means Committee’s tax proposals are expected to contribute notably to the debt, primarily due to expanded individual and estate tax measures and the introduction of new tax policies. These increases are partially offset by substantial savings from revisions to energy and clean vehicle tax credits enacted under the Inflation Reduction Act. Despite notable spending reductions across programs such as Medicaid, student loans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, lower tax revenues and rising costs in other areas are likely to keep the fiscal deficit elevated and continue adding to the national debt.

Esimated Deficit Imapact bar graph

Based on last year’s import data, the more than $3 trillion that the U.S. imports every year could theoretically yield significant tariff revenues. However, actual collections are likely to be less due to behavioral responses and price elasticity, as consumers adjust their spending or switch to alternatives. While it's hard to pinpoint the exact impact, our annual outlook anticipates a substantial amount in tariff revenue. This projection aligns with a broad range of recent economic and academic estimates. As such, the expected revenue could help offset some of the costs of the newly proposed provisions and contribute to covering rising interest payments tied to national debt growth.

Tariff Collections graph

However, this projection has several flaws as it assumes no decline in import volumes, which is an optimistic scenario given the potential for trade tensions and demand shifts. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from other countries could further reduce net revenues, as some of the gains would need to be redirected to support sectors impacted by those reciprocal measures. For example, in 2018 and 2019, a significant portion of the tariff revenues collected in 2018 was redistributed to the agricultural sector that was targeted by retaliatory tariffs imposed by countries like China, the European Union, and others. Therefore, if we have a net increase in tariff revenues, it will be used to either transfer income to sectors negatively affected by reciprocal tariffs and/or to, potentially, lower the deficit compared to the baseline.