Will Social Security Change As Spending Cuts Are Considered?

Social Security faces funding issues by 2035, but major changes to the program are unlikely in the near term. Our Bill Cass highlights what is being discussed as the federal government looks to reduce spending.

As the new administration explores options to reduce federal government spending, concerns are rising around changes to Social Security. For example, what actions may be considered that could potentially impact Social Security benefits? While there have been discussions around closing offices or reducing the workforce of the Social Security Administration, making structural modifications to Social Security, such as raising the retirement age, are more complicated. For this reason, major changes to Social Security in the near term are unlikely.

Republican lawmakers are currently pursuing tax and spending-related changes through a process known as budget reconciliation. To gain more understanding of the reconciliation, see our recent post, “Tax policy takes center stage: What to watch on Capitol Hill.” This process allows lawmakers to pass legislation in the Senate with a simple majority, avoiding the 60 vote-threshold needed to avoid a filibuster. Even with slim majorities in both chambers of Congress, the Republicans can advance a bill without Democrat votes.

However, Senate procedural rules prevent using the budget reconciliation process to make changes to Social Security. The Congressional Budget Act of 1974, which introduced budget reconciliation, explicitly prevents changes to Social Security unless normal rules are followed. Since it’s probably unlikely that we’ll see a party control at least 60 seats in the Senate, making major changes will require bipartisan support. Latest projections call for the Social Security Trust Fund to be depleted in 2035, causing a roughly 20% reduction in benefits, unless Congress takes action.

Here are some potential policy options to fix Social Security:

increase taxes