1. 2Q GDP Hits 4.1% on Strong Consumer Spending
2. Number of US Public Companies Falls by Almost 50%
3. Fewer Public Companies = Lost Investor Opportunities
Overview
Most investors are not aware of this but the number of publicly-traded companies listed on US stock exchanges has plunged almost 50% since the peak in 1996. This phenomenon is not limited to the United States. It is also happening in Canada, Switzerland, Germany, France, the UK and other developed nations, which have seen the number of listed companies fall 20%–60% from the peak in the last couple of decades.
It has never been fun to be a publicly-traded company. Dealing with increasingly complex government and industry regulations is expensive; dealing with shareholders and the media is time consuming; and keeping your publicly-traded company competitive is a never ending challenge.
The other thing that is changing, perhaps the most important thing, is that more and more large companies no longer need to be listed on stock exchanges in order to raise capital. As more large companies elect to remain privately-held, and more publicly-traded companies convert to private, investors are deprived of sharing in the growth of some of America’s most exciting innovations. That’s what we’ll talk about today.
Before we get to that discussion, I will briefly analyze last Friday’s initial estimate of 2Q GDP.
2Q GDP Hits 4.1%, Best Since 2014, Strong Consumer Spending
Gross Domestic Product grew at a solid 4.1% annual rate in the second quarter, its best pace since 2014, boosting hopes that the economy is ready to break out of its decade-long slumber. The number was slightly below the pre-report consensus of 4.2% but at least it showed a surge in consumer spending and business investment.
That's the fastest rate of the growth since the 4.9% in the 3Q of 2014 and the third-best growth rate since the Great Recession. In addition to the strong 2Q, the Commerce Department revised its 1Q GDP reading up from 2.0% to 2.2%. The economy has now averaged 3.1% GDP growth over the last six months ended June.
In addition to the rise in consumer and business spending, increases in exports and government spending also helped. Consumer spending rose 4% while business investment grew 7.3% and federal government outlays increased by 3.5%.
Exports rose in part as farmers rushed to get soybeans to China ahead of expected retaliatory tariffs to take effect in the coming days. Declines in private inventory investment and residential fixed investment were the main drags on GDP in the 2Q, the report said.
All in all, it was a very strong report, and President Trump wasted no time taking credit for it.
Number of US Public Companies Fall by Almost 50%
Today there are fewer publicly-traded companies in the US than at any time over the last 40 years. The peak year for public markets was 1996, when over 8,000 companies were listed on US exchanges. Today that number is down nearly 50% to 4,336, according to the World Federation of Exchanges.
As noted above, this troubling trend isn’t just limited to the United States. The number of companies in developed markets around the world is shrinking: Canada, Switzerland, Germany, France, the U.K. and others have seen the number of listed companies fall 20%–60% from their peak. The question is, why?
Clearly the increase in mergers and acquisitions over the last 40 years played a major role in shrinking the number of public companies. As globalization became a more important factor, competition increased and companies became vulnerable to predators. Many sought refuge by consolidating with businesses in similar or related industries.
Likewise, the increase in leveraged buy-outs (LBOs) where management and/or outside investors take companies from public to private played a major role in reducing the number of listed companies. LBOs can have many different forms and structures. Meanwhile, the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) remains at a fraction of what it was in the 1980s and 1990s.
Fewer Public Companies = Lost Investor Opportunities
Running a publicly-traded company is always a challenge. A company is judged by its quarterly earnings performance, which sometimes causes it to make decisions that might not be in its long-term best interest. Executives of public companies have to spend time talking to security analysts and holding conference calls when they could be working on matters that would improve growth prospects. Legal issues and investor relations are also time-consuming factors.
Two basic incentives encourage companies to go public: raising capital and monetizing the value of the company for employees. Today, both of these objectives can be satisfied in the private market by venture capitalists and other investors. As a result, major innovative companies like Uber and Airbnb have chosen to remain private for much longer than would have been the case several decades ago. And more companies have elected to convert from public to private.
As more companies have deferred or avoided going public, the number of companies investors can choose from has become more limited. Although investors have been deprived of the opportunity of participating in their growth, the companies themselves have enjoyed more flexibility in the early stages of development when their earnings are likely to be volatile. Therefore, staying (or going) private is not necessarily an example of short-term thinking – it may be a sound business decision.
Final Note: While the number of publicly-traded stocks listed on US exchanges has declined by almost 50% (from over 8,000 in 1996 to 4,336 recently), total stock market capitalization has risen to a new record high of $32.2 trillion this year – thanks to big increases in stock prices in recent years.
The World Bank estimates that total global stock market capitalization is at $80 trillion.
All the best,
Gary D. Halbert
Forecasts & Trends E-Letter is published by Halbert Wealth Management, Inc. Gary D. Halbert is the president and CEO of Halbert Wealth Management, Inc. and is the editor of this publication. Information contained herein is taken from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy. Opinions and recommendations herein generally reflect the judgement of Gary D. Halbert (or another named author) and may change at any time without written notice. Market opinions contained herein are intended as general observations and are not intended as specific investment advice. Readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions. This electronic newsletter does not constitute an offer of sale of any securities. Gary D. Halbert, Halbert Wealth Management, Inc., and its affiliated companies, its officers, directors and/or employees may or may not have investments in markets or programs mentioned herein. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Reprinting for family or friends is allowed with proper credit. However, republishing (written or electronically) in its entirety or through the use of extensive quotes is prohibited without prior written consent.
© Halbert Wealth Management
© Halbert Wealth Management
Read more commentaries by Halbert Wealth Management