Russ reviews the landscape after the selloff and discusses how little has actually changed.
Monday was all about superlatives: the largest one-day point drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the biggest one-day percentage change in the VIX Index. Apart from the gyrations, Monday was also distinguished in another respect: There was no obvious catalyst for the spike in volatility. While last Friday’s stronger-than-expected jobs report spooked investors, a slight acceleration in wage growth does not typically result in a doubling of volatility.
Instead, as has happened in the past, market volatility was less about the economy and more about unwinding extremely crowded trades, most notably a bet on low volatility.
As the dust settles, if only temporarily, investors are left wondering what has changed. From my perspective, not much.
1. The selloff was narrow, not systemic.
Although it was hard to find much comfort in Monday’s volatility, it is worth highlighting that the selling was mostly confined to stocks. This should be treated as a positive. While there is no law of nature that prevents divergences between asset classes, systemic selloffs, by definition, involve more than one asset class. Other asset classes, most importantly credit, proved more stable. High yield spreads have widened about 25 basis points (bps, or 0.25%) from the late January low. Still, at approximately 335 bps, spreads are only back to where they were earlier in the year. In contrast, during the correction in early 2016, spreads widened to over 800 bps.
2. The magnitude of the rise in volatility is unlikely to last.
The stability in spreads is important because historically spreads are the best coincident indicator of equity market volatility. As I’ve discussed in previous blogs, if investors are really concerned about the economy, they should demand a higher premium to loan to more speculative companies. This is not the case today. Given still benign financial market conditions and a solid economy, a simple model of the VIX suggests U.S. equity market volatility should be trading in the mid-teens, not over 30. Put differently, the spike in volatility appears completely disproportionate (see the chart below). For the first time in years, implied volatility looks too high relative to the real economy and credit markets.