GDP Stunner: 2Q Growth Was Less Than Half of Forecast
1. GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in 2Q, Only 1.0% in First Half
2. Uncertainty, Over-Regulation Drive Business Investment Down
3. House GOP’s “Better Way Agenda” – A Good Start at Reform
4. How the Fed is Likely to React to Disappointing GDP Report
5. New Hillary Scandal – If True It’s By Far Most Serious To-Date
GDP Grew a Disappointing 1.2% in 2Q, Only 1.0% in First Half
The Commerce Department reported last Friday that gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the US, rose only 1.2% (annual rate) in the second quarter. That was less than half the pre-report consensus of 2.6%. This was one of the largest misses by forecasters in quite some time.
Yet that was not the only bad news in the report. The Commerce Department also revised 1Q GDP down from 1.1% to 0.8%. That means the economy grew at only a pace of 1.0% in the first half of this year, the weakest start to a year since 2011. The government also revised down GDP for the 4Q of last year from 1.4% to only 0.9%. Needless to say, this was a very disappointing report.
This means that since last September the economy has braked from the 2.2% average during 2012-2015 into a near-stall speed of about 1% growth. Seven years after the recession ended, President Obama on Wednesday took credit for an economy that he called “stronger and more prosperous than it was when we started.”
Never mind that the economy was in a deep recession when he came into office – thus the bar was about as low as it gets. He also failed to mention that the current recovery which began in June 2009 has been the weakest recovery since World War II. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
The only thing really positive in last Friday’s GDP report was the fact that consumer spending showed a robust increase of 4.2% (annual rate) in the 2Q, the best number in a year and a half. Even though consumer spending accounts for over two-thirds of GDP, consumers can’t lift the economy all on their own.
The GDP miss last Friday came in large part because of another quarterly decline in business fixed non-residential investment (new factories, equipment, hardware, software, etc.).
Business investment shrank at a 2.2% annual rate in the 2Q. This marked the third consecutive quarterly decline in new business investment as you can see in the chart at left.
Total private business investment, which includes residential and business spending, dropped at a 3.2% pace in the 2Q, the most in seven years.
Apart from a brief stretch in 2014, private business investment in plants, equipment, etc. has been historically weak for the last three years.
Making matters worse, companies downsized their inventories for the fifth consecutive quarter, according to Friday’s report. Inventories were reduced by $8.1 billion in the 2Q, the most since the 3Q of 2011 and subtracted 1.2% points from overall economic growth.
Prior to last Friday’s disappointing GDP report, many economists had been forecasting US economic growth of 2.0% to nearly 3.0% for all of 2016. But after the big miss on 2Q GDP and the downward revisions to the 1Q of 2016 and 4Q of 2015, economists are scurrying to downgrade their forecasts.
I’ve already seen revisions down to only 1.5% to 2.0%. With growth of only 1% in the first half of this year, the economy would have to grow 3% in the second half to average a meager 2%. Most forecasters continue to believe the economy will pick up in the second half of this year, but that remains to be seen.
Uncertainty, Over-Regulation Drive Business Investment Down
Business investment spurs the growth and productivity gains that produce more jobs and ultimately higher wages. As noted above, even though consumers have been resilient, they can’t drive growth by themselves. To get to 3% or better growth, fixed non-residential investment needs to be expanding not declining.
Declining business investment is hobbling an already sluggish U.S. expansion, raising concerns about the economy’s durability as the presidential campaign heads into its final stretch. The investment plunge is a signal that business is on strike, or at least depressed by uncertainty.
Most CEOs will be risk-averse and conservative with their balance sheets until they see signs of a growth rebound, even though they’re sitting atop record piles of cash and the cost of capital is at all-time lows. They will also hold off investing until they have a better sense of the future tax and regulatory burdens they are likely to face next year.
They can’t be reassured by what they heard in Philadelphia last week, where the Obama-Clinton Democrats promised more of the policies that have stifled growth the last eight years. For example, Hillary Clinton declared: “Wall Street, corporations and the super-rich are going to start paying their fair share of taxes.”
Start? The richest 1% already pay almost 40% of federal income tax revenue. Maybe Hillary will disclose which sage economic advisers have told her that raising taxes on business will yield more business investment. We already have the highest business income tax in the developed world at 35% at the federal level and another average of 4% at the state level.
President Obama’s unprecedented wave of regulatory costs is another main reason business isn’t investing. Yet Mrs. Clinton is promising more costly rules on finance, health care, drug prices, higher mandated wages and benefits and more.
Normally all of this would help the party that doesn’t hold the White House, but Donald Trump is talking more about law and order and terrorism than the economy. His two main economic themes are restricting the labor force with immigration controls and raising the prices of imports with new tariffs. Both would harm the economy.
Mr. Trump does say he’ll reduce regulation and cut taxes, but he offers few details and these are hardly his main talking points. In his Cleveland acceptance speech, he mentioned them almost as an afterthought.
House GOP’s “Better Way Agenda” – A Good Start at Reform
About the only serious pro-growth agenda being offered today is the House GOP’s “Better Way Agenda” that reportedly would reform the business tax code, ease certain regulations and otherwise remove barriers to business investment and job creation.
In addition to reforms aimed at businesses and creating jobs, the Better Way Agendaincludes proposals for serious income tax reform and simplification, reform of healthcare, poverty reduction, national security enhancements and the restoration of constitutional authority.
House GOP leaders have come together with Speaker Paul Ryan to craft these proposals aimed at making America stronger. After several discussions and one meeting with Donald Trump, the Speaker said he’s received assurances from Trump that he’d turn many of the House GOP’s policy priorities into law if he becomes president.
The non-partisan Tax Foundation estimates the Better Way package would make the economy almost 10% larger and lift wages by 8%. Of course, none of this Better Way legislation, assuming the proposals make it through the Senate, is going anywhere as long as Obama is in the White House.
If Hillary is our next president, she would certainly veto the Better Way legislation given how far to the left politically she has moved in her effort to defeat Bernie Sanders. If Hillary wins the election, the Better Waylegislation will likely never see the light of day, and we may see another lost decade of slow growth, or worse given Hillary’s anti-growth policies.
How the Fed is Likely to React to the Surprise GDP Report
I must admit to feeling something like a ping pong ball when it comes to predicting when or if the Fed is going to raise its short-term interest rate. One week, it looks like the Fed is ready to hike at the next meeting. Then a week or so later, a rate hike seems to be off the table.
Take my Blog last Thursday which I wrote the day after the latest Fed Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting concluded. The policy statement that the Committee released last Wednesday was decidedly upbeat. It upgraded its assessment of the economy, noted that risks to that outlook had diminished and remained committed to normalizing monetary policy (ie – gradual rate hikes).
Most Fedwatchers like me read that statement and concluded that a rate hike is definitely on the table for the next FOMC meeting on September 20-21. Then along comes last Friday’s terrible GDP report for the 2Q. As noted above, that report was a real stunner in that growth was less than half of what was expected, not to mention that the Commerce Department revised down its previous estimate for the 1Q of this year and the 4Q of last year.
In my Blog last week, I suggested that the next clue as to when the Fed will hike the Fed Funds rate will be on Wednesday, August 17 when the Fed will release the minutes from its July 26-27 meeting. I suggested that those minutes are likely to show that the policy Committee is “feeling much more confident about the economy and is thus ready to raise rates” possibly on September 21.
I wrote those words last Thursday when the expectation was that the GDP report on Friday morning would show 2Q growth of 2.6% or maybe even better. That was the same pre-report consensus the Fed had when it released its upbeat policy statement last Wednesday.
In my view, the terrible GDP report last Friday means that a Fed rate hike in September is now off the table again. In fact, if we don’t see some significant improvement in the economy just ahead, the next rate hike may not come until sometime next year.
Keep in mind that we will see the minutes from the July 26-27 FOMC meeting on August 17, and those minutes may indeed show that the Committee was feeling considerably more upbeat about the economy at that time. But that optimism was almost certainly dashed last Friday by the very disappointing GDP report.
The only way I could see a rate hike in September happen would be for a significant upward revision to 2Q GDP on August 26 when we get the Commerce Department’s second estimate of 2Q GDP. I will be surprised to see an upward revision strong enough to convince a majority of the FOMC members to vote for a rate hike at the September 20-21 policy meeting. We’ll see.
A New Hillary Scandal – If True It’s By Far the Most Serious To-Date
The mainstream media is currently lambasting Donald Trump for his comments last week suggesting that maybe the Russians could find Hillary’s 30,000+ e-mails that she deleted after her time as Secretary of State.
Yet a new story is emerging that Hillary and the State Department may have urged US technology companies to fund Russian research for military purposes in 2010-2012 and probably beyond. In return, the Clinton Foundation reportedly received tens of millions in contributions from US and Russian entities that stood to profit from the arrangement.
While THE WALL STREET JOURNAL reported on this potentially scathing story on Sunday, the mainstream media is avoiding it like the plague, at least so far. For that reason, I am including a link to thatJOURNAL article for you just below. You really should read it:
The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections
I don’t know where this story goes from here. Assuming it’s true as the Journal suggests, it will easily be the most serious scandal ever for Ms. Clinton, as it directly compromised US national security. And it will prove once and for all that Hillary willingly put the interest of the Clinton Foundation above the best interests of the country.
Unrelated, I have a link below which outlines all of the huge tax increases Ms. Clinton has in mind if she becomes our next president. You need to know about this as well.
Best personal regards,
Forecasts & Trends E-Letter is published by ProFutures, Inc. Gary D. Halbert is the president and CEO of ProFutures, Inc. and is the editor of this publication. Information contained herein is taken from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy. Opinions and recommendations herein generally reflect the judgement of Gary D. Halbert (or another named author) and may change at any time without written notice. Market opinions contained herein are intended as general observations and are not intended as specific investment advice. Readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions. This electronic newsletter does not constitute an offer of sale of any securities. Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc., and its affiliated companies, its officers, directors and/or employees may or may not have investments in markets or programs mentioned herein. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Reprinting for family or friends is allowed with proper credit. However, republishing (written or electronically) in its entirety or through the use of extensive quotes is prohibited without prior written consent.