Americans Working Beyond Age 65 Hits New Record


1. Americans Working Beyond Age 65 Hits New Record High

2. Another Big Reason Americans Are Working Past Age 65

3. Experts Warn: China About to Become Huge Global Problem


A new report from the US Labor Department last week found that more Americans are working past the age of 65 than ever before. Part of the reason is that Americans are living longer and more people want to work beyond age 65. But the main reason is that most Americans have not saved nearly enough for retirement, and many have no choice but to keep working.

Another factor is that many Americans are working beyond age 65 in order to keep their employer health insurance. More companies are cutting back the benefits paid to retired employees, so many Americans keep working as long as they can.

Following that discussion, I will make a case that China is going to once again negatively affect the US stock markets in the weeks and months just ahead. New data suggest that China’s economy is not nearly as strong as their government reports. Tighten your seat belts.

Given the range of topics we’ll cover today, it should be an interesting letter. I hope so.

Americans Working Beyond Age 65 Hits New Record High

Almost 20% of Americans 65 and older are still working, according to the latest data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). That’s the highest percentage of 65+ people still working since the early 1960s, before the US enacted Medicare.

Because of the huge Baby Boom generation that is just now hitting retirement age, the US has the largest number of older workers ever. The BLS says there are now more than nine million Americans over 65 who are still in the workforce.

Americans Are Working Longer

Why are more people than ever putting off retirement? The answer: THEY NEED THE MONEY.

Three in five retirees (60%) surveyed by the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies said making money and/or earning benefits (including health insurance) was the main reason they had to keep working beyond age 65.

The financial crisis (late 2007/early 2009) and the tech bust (late 2000/2001) devastated many Baby Boomers’ retirement savings. That’s if they had any to begin with. Today, 60% of US households have no money in a 401(k) or similar retirement account. I’ve been writing about this problem for years.

Some 36% of those working beyond age 65 told Transamerica they are working longer because they enjoy their jobs and want to stay involved. With Americans living longer and healthier, it is not unusual that many want to keep working longer. That’s interesting but most have no choice.

Education also comes into play when it comes to working later in life. People with college and graduate degrees tend to work to older ages than those with less schooling, according to a 2013 study by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. And since 1985 the share of older Americans with college degrees has tripled, to about a third of 60-74 year-olds.

Another factor is that a growing number of employers actually want their best employees to stick around longer. With the US unemployment rate at 5%, the lowest since early 2008, employers have a greater incentive to encourage older employees to work beyond age 65. They might not be able to replace them.

With more education, these skilled, experienced workers have become more valuable to employers. In 1985, workers tended to earn the highest salaries of their careers in their 40s, the Center for Retirement Research study found. Yet by 2010, those peak earning years had shifted to the 50s. All age groups older than 50 earned more than they did 25 years earlier, with those in their 60s making 30% more. Interestingly, by 2010 workers under 50 actually earned less than they used to.

Next, there are numerous studies which conclude that working longer actually improves the health of many older people, which makes sense to me. There are some studies that disagree but a lot depends on how your health is by age 65, which varies widely of course.

Here’s another interesting twist on retirement. A recent study by the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that many retired Americans are not enjoying their golden years as much as they expected. This study found that less than 50% of retirees said they were “very satisfied” in retirement in 2012 versus over 60% in 1998. Again, think money.

In conclusion, more Americans are working beyond age 65 for two primary reasons (in order): 1) They haven’t saved nearly enough to retire in the lifestyle they are accustomed; and 2) They are healthier and living longer and don’t want to retire at age 65.

Finally, there are important reasons to delay retirement until age 70, if possible, to maximize Social Security benefits, but space does not permit me to get into that detailed discussion today.

Another Big Reason Americans Are Working Past Age 65

More and more American employers are reducing or eliminating healthcare benefits for their retired employees. According to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation report, retiree health coverage is becoming an endangered species.

As recently as 1988, two-thirds (66%) of companies that employed 200 workers or more and offered healthcare coverage for active workers also offered retiree health plans that their former employees could access. Yet that number plummeted to only 23% in 2015.

Large Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits

Employer-sponsored retiree health coverage once played a key role in supplementing Medicare. Yet this type of coverage has been eroding for decades, as seen in the chart above. The decline, which has been steady and almost unbroken, reflects the rising cost of healthcare and employers’ diminishing sense of responsibility for long-term workers in retirement.

The implications of this trend hit today’s retirees, who typically are eligible for Medicare upon turning 65, very hard. The Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) report states: “The drop in retiree health coverage has important implications for retiring boomers who are approaching their Medicare years with a different set of insurance needs and choices than their parents’ generation.”

Financial protection against unexpected healthcare costs is crucial for most Medicare enrollees, especially middle and low-income members, because the gaps in Medicare can be onerous. The deductible for Medicare Part A, which covers inpatient services, is $1,288 this year, plus a co-pay of $322 per hospital day after 60 days. Part B, which covers outpatient care, has a modest annual deductible of $166 but pays only 80% of approved rates for most services.

As a result, many retirees are choosing to purchase so-called “Medigap” policies which fill in the gaps caused by Medicare’s deductibles, cost-sharing rates and benefit limitations. The proliferation of these types of policies has the potential to drive up healthcare costs since people who have this coverage tend to seek considerably more healthcare on average than those who don’t.

This trend is likely to fuel interest in Congress to legislate limits on what Medigap plans can cover. As a result of these likely limits, more Medicare enrollees may opt for so-called “Medicare Advantage” plans that resemble HMOs in offering narrower provider networks, but with annual caps on out-of-pocket spending. Yet Medicare Advantage plans are also more expensive for the government.

While this brief discussion of shrinking retiree health coverage is far from comprehensive, the trend is clear. It does underscore why more and more Americans are choosing to work beyond the age of 65. Many retirees cannot afford the health coverage they need. Many working beyond 65 are doing so to keep the health plan their employer provides, or to make the money it requires to purchase one of the supplemental plans discussed above.

Experts Warn: China About to Become Huge Global Problem

You may recall that worries about China’s economy roiled US equity markets late last summer after China’s largest stock markets suddenly collapsed by almost 30% in June and early July. In response, our S&P 500 Index declined over 11% in just a few weeks from late July to late August.

Yet based on encouraging reports from Chinese authorities last fall, worries about China dissipated and US stocks rebounded sharply. Then in January, China reported that its economy grew at the annual rate of 6.9% for all of last year. Investors breathed a sigh of relief.

Recently, China reported that its economy grew at an annual rate of 6.7% in the 1Q of this year. Another sigh of relief. However, more and more prominent experts on China are coming to the conclusion that these numbers may be significantly overstated, both for last year and the 1Q of this year.

Two prominent experts on China, each with his own best-selling book, Gordon Chang and Frazier Howie, believe that China’s economy grew by only 3-4% last year as opposed to the 6.9% figure put out by the country’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Some are calling it the “Dead Panda Economy.”

The authors argue that there’s no way growth could have been 6.7% in the 1Q. Like many countries around the world, 2016 got off to a rocky start in China in January and February. While the economy did post a strong rebound in March, it was not nearly enough to result in a 6.7% first quarter, the authors say. And based on preliminary reports, weakness returned in April in a big way.

Another thing that makes the authors skeptical of the official government numbers is the fact that the Peoples’ Bank of China went on an unprecedented stimulus spree in the 1Q. Credit growth in the 1Q was more than twice that in the 4Q as China created almost $1 trillion in new credit during the quarter, the largest quarterly increase in history. If the economy was really growing at 6.7%, there would be no need for such massive stimulus.

Both authors believe that the Chinese economy is headed lower, perhaps even into a recession before too long. Likewise, they believe that China’s central bank is past the point of being able to effectively goose its economy with massive stimulus.

Looking at some specific economic numbers, we see that China’s exports fell more than expected in April and have now dropped in nine of the last 10 months. Imports, considered a vital sign of domestic demand, have fallen for 18 straight months.

Meanwhile, China’s previously vibrant manufacturing sector has seen a significant decline over the last year. It’s Purchasing Managers Index for April came in at only 50.1, barely above 50.0 which divides expansion from contraction.

For all of these reasons, I expect worries about China to escalate in the weeks and months just ahead, especially when the financial media wakes up to the fact that China still has big problems that are probably going to get worse before they get better.

S&P 500

US stocks are at a critical juncture and the S&P 500 looks very “toppy” from a technical perspective -- with lower highs and lower lows over the last year. If the US equity markets become concerned that China is once again a serious problem, we could see another sizable move to the downside.

All the best,
Gary D. Halbert

Forecasts & Trends E-Letter is published by ProFutures, Inc. Gary D. Halbert is the president and CEO of ProFutures, Inc. and is the editor of this publication. Information contained herein is taken from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy. Opinions and recommendations herein generally reflect the judgement of Gary D. Halbert (or another named author) and may change at any time without written notice. Market opinions contained herein are intended as general observations and are not intended as specific investment advice. Readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions. This electronic newsletter does not constitute an offer of sale of any securities. Gary D. Halbert, ProFutures, Inc., and its affiliated companies, its officers, directors and/or employees may or may not have investments in markets or programs mentioned herein. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Reprinting for family or friends is allowed with proper credit. However, republishing (written or electronically) in its entirety or through the use of extensive quotes is prohibited without prior written consent.

© Halbert Wealth Management

© Halbert Wealth Management

Read more commentaries by Halbert Wealth Management