An uncontrolled popular urge to speculate in financial markets is giving regulators a headache everywhere. It is especially worrying in India, where trading in futures and options is now more than 400 times bigger than the underlying cash-market turnover. This is a slow transfer of wealth from the real economy to a financial elite, the full impact of which may only be felt when it’s too late to stop it.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India’s crackdown on social media influencers peddling advice is a losing battle. Although nine out of 10 individual traders are losing money, retail investors can’t get enough of derivatives. A smartphone-led gamification of investing is complete.
It wasn’t always like this. Until the early 1990s, financial markets and mavens never had a large sway over the country’s economy or public imagination. People kept their money at state-owned banks. Direct stock ownership was rare. Those with surplus savings bought slips of paper from the Unit Trust of India, a black box of an investor that regularly paid 20%-25% as dividends on capital. That was the extent of middle-class Indians’ greed for yield.
Things began to change when the economy opened up. Harshad Mehta, a flashy Mumbai stockbroker, acquired the moniker of “Big Bull.” He became the first Indian to buy a Lexus LS400, and in early 1992 took out an eight-column newspaper ad with the headline: “Harshad Mehta is a liar,” implying, of course, that he was just the opposite. By the end of that year, however, Mehta had been arrested for masterminding a huge securities scam. The erosion of public confidence in a market that had only recently started accepting foreign institutional money led to a slew of changes: electronic trading, guaranteed settlements, replacement of paper-based share certificates with account entries to stop counterfeiting, and — starting in 2000 — exchange-traded derivatives.
It is this last reform that has become too much of a good thing. The SEBI’s research shows that more than 80% of individual traders dabbling in options are men. They’re mostly young: The 20-to-30-year-old age group is witnessing the biggest surge. For the few who’re lucky to turn a profit, anywhere between 15% to half of their take is going toward paying brokerage, clearing fees, exchange and regulatory charges and taxes. As for the 89% of traders losing money, transaction costs are making their pain worse.
A recent study in the Lancet shows a 73% increase in suicide deaths between 2014 and 2021 among Indian men earning roughly between $6,000 and $12,000 annually, enough to qualify them as affluent. Men who are poorer or richer have seen a smaller jump in suicide rates. It isn’t possible to draw a definitive link with speculative trades gone wrong, but newspaper reports do suggest stock-market losses are driving even young professionals to distress.