No, Small Banks Aren’t Holding the Bag on Half-Empty Towers

One of the scarier financial factoids making the rounds this year is that local and regional banks hold 70% of US commercial real estate debt. Office buildings have been plummeting in value because of hybrid work, all commercial real estate faces challenges as low-interest loans mature amid higher rates, and look who’s holding the bag: the nation’s small and midsize banks, already facing doubters after deposit runs led to the failure of several of them earlier this year.

Happily, this factoid isn’t true. That is, small banks — defined as those, not among the country’s 25 largest — do in fact hold 69% of the commercial real estate loans on the balance sheets of domestically chartered commercial banks, up from 60% five years ago, according to the Federal Reserve’s weekly reports on bank assets and liabilities. But most US commercial real estate debt is owed to lenders other than domestically chartered commercial banks.

As of the end of March, this time according to the Fed’s quarterly Financial Accounts of the United States, domestic depository institutions (aka banks)1 held 47% of CRE debt, which works out to about 32% of the total in the hands of banks outside the top 25. That’s much less than 70%. It’s still a lot, though, and no other class of CRE lender comes close to the banks.

Where the CRE Loans Are

Perhaps more to the point for those worried about smaller banks’ commercial real estate exposure, CRE loans make up a much larger share of assets at smaller banks than they do at the 25 biggest.

Smaller Banks Are More Dependent on CRE

A longer-term view from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. that divides banks into five asset-size classes (and uses a narrower definition of commercial real estate) makes clear that the CRE concentration is highest for banks in the $100 million to $10 billion asset range — community banks, basically.

CRE Lending by Bank Size