Bonds, AI, and a Bull Market That Has Kept Going

Bonds, AI, and a Bull Market That Has Kept Going

Key takeaways

  • Treasuries haven’t appeared to lose their safe-haven status. Yields reversed course while Middle East concerns intensified, challenging the idea that the bond market had lost faith in the US.

  • Credit discipline can be a sign of a healthy market, as investors asked tougher questions and separated stronger borrowers from weaker ones.

  • AI demand for some of the most well-known companies remained strong, as usage, revenues, and enterprise adoption grew despite questions about spending and returns.

There’s a famous line from political strategist James Carville that if he were reincarnated, he’d like to come back as the bond market because “you can intimidate everybody.”

Only a few weeks ago, a narrative emerged that the bond market had decided to intimidate the United States. Treasury yields were rising,1 and prominent investors, including Stanley Druckenmiller and Ray Dalio, raised concerns over the sustainability of US debt and the bill finally coming due. There were clear problems with that narrative, in my view. Inflation expectations remained relatively contained2 and the US dollar was strong.3 Those aren't typically the calling cards of a market losing faith in US assets.

Sure enough, Treasury yields reversed course. Last week, amid intensified concerns in the Middle East, Treasuries rallied further.4 That response challenged the idea that US government bonds had suddenly lost their traditional safe-haven appeal.

Credit market became more discerning

The bond market was doing a bit of bullying. It wasn't just bullying the US Treasury market.

Last week, I discussed the pressure facing parts of the artificial intelligence ecosystem, including CoreWeave and other neocloud companies. Borrowing costs had risen, and credit default spreads had widened.5 The moves prompted concerns that the AI boom was beginning to unravel.

I saw it differently.

The credit market had become more discerning. Companies with greater leverage, more uncertain cash flows, or business models requiring enormous amounts of capital appeared to be more scrutinized. The market had done what a healthy market should do in my view. Bull markets don’t require every company to succeed. In fact, healthy bull markets have often exposed and ultimately weeded out weaker, more speculative, or fundamentally unsound companies. That’s not a statement about CoreWeave specifically. It’s simply an observation about how functioning capital markets have tended to allocate capital. Discipline is a feature, not a bug.

And then came last week's AI news.

See more: Are Bonds Pricing In a Fed Policy Mistake?