AI is Taking Over the Value Style Too

ai-taking-over

For decades, investors have used growth and value allocations as a foundational block of equity portfolio construction. The distinction has been intuitive and practical. Investors expected growth to provide exposure to faster-growing companies, often with higher valuation multiples and greater sensitivity to earnings expectations. They expected value allocations to deliver a counterweight through lower multiple businesses, broader sector diversification, and more exposure to economically cyclical or defensive industries.

They owned both because they believed each would respond differently to changing market conditions.

See more: AI, Higher Rates Raise the Bar for Diversification

Those assumptions merit a closer look today. Equity allocations that include a value tilt may be more exposed to AI investment cycles, cloud spending, hyperscaler capital expenditures and mega-cap technology earnings than investors believe. As growth and value become less distinct, investors should more closely question the risks they’re taking within their value allocations.

Large-Cap Value’s Changing Identity

Take the recent reconstitution of the Russell value and growth illustrates how value’s profile is evolving. Amazon is now the largest constituent in the Russell 1000 Value Index . Information technology exposure increased to 18.6% from 11.7% (Exhibit 1), while Magnificent Seven exposure rose to 16% from 6%. The index remains a legitimate value benchmark according to Russell's methodology, but it is increasingly influenced by forces that investors historically associated with growth.

exh 1 russel 1000 value

Historically, interest rates, credit conditions, bank profitability, industrial activity, energy prices and broader economic cyclicality primarily influenced value stocks. Today, many companies in the value index are increasingly tied to AI capital spending, cloud growth, semiconductor demand, platform monetization, regulatory developments and earnings expectations for a small number of technology giants.

As a result, value is looking a lot more like growth. With the reconstitution, overlap within the Russell 1000 Value Index rose to roughly 34.5%, meaning about one-third of the value benchmark now sits in securities that also appear in growth. A 50/50 allocation to Russell 1000 Growth and Russell 1000 Value could therefore hold about 15% to 17% in the same companies. Further, correlation between the indexes has risen to nearly 0.3, from almost zero just a couple years ago.