Attractive yields and resilient credit conditions are creating opportunities across fixed income, but uncertainty around inflation and interest rates makes flexibility, selectivity and disciplined risk management especially important.
Key Highlights
- Today’s yields create a compelling starting point. Investors can earn meaningful income while retaining the potential for price appreciation if inflation moderates.
- Inflation remains the swing factor. Cooling inflation could add capital appreciation; sticky inflation would leave income as the primary return driver.
- Opportunity is selective. Non-agency securitized assets and investment-grade credit offer relative value, while agency mortgages appear less compelling after their recent strength.
- A flexible core strategy offers several ways to respond. Sector allocation, security selection and duration allow managers to pursue opportunity without relying on a single market forecast.
- Risk avoidance remains central. Because bond-market downside can be far greater than upside, selectivity is an important part of the active-management case.
Today’s bond market offers something investors lacked during much of the low-rate era: meaningful income and the potential for capital appreciation if inflation continues to moderate. All-in yields are attractive, corporate fundamentals remain broadly sound and demand for bonds is robust. Yet government yields remain volatile as inflation, Federal Reserve policy and fiscal concerns continue to evolve. The opportunity is real, but the path to total return is unlikely to be smooth.
That is where a flexible core bond strategy can benefit investors. We think of core as the anchor of an investor’s fixed-income allocation, seeking income, diversification and stability without reaching so far for return that it deviates from the role that a core bond allocation is intended for in a portfolio. Sector allocation, security selection and duration decisions provide several ways to pursue alpha opportunities while managing the risks created by an uncertain rate environment.
Flexibility with a defined purpose
The U.S. core bond investment landscape provides a wide opportunity set across maturities and among Treasuries, government agencies, mortgage-backed securities, corporate credit and securitized assets. Some core mandates also permit modest allocations beyond the investment grade focused benchmark when the compensation justifies the added risk.
That breadth matters because bond sectors do not move in lockstep. Growth, inflation, interest rates, credit conditions and new supply affect each part of the market differently. The objective is not to ‘go anywhere’ for its own sake, but to use several measured levers while keeping the portfolio’s risk profile consistent with its core assignment.
We believe flexibility works through three main channels: sector allocation, individual security selection and duration. A useful way to frame the balance is roughly half of realized excess return has come from sector decisions, a quarter from bottom-up security selection and a quarter from interest-rate positioning. It is a diversified approach to decision-making, not one oversized macro bet.
Why bond allocations make a strong case for active management
The active-versus-passive question looks different in fixed income than it does in equities. A bond's upside is naturally bounded: investors receive income and, assuming repayment, par at maturity. The downside can be far more dramatic. If an issuer suffers a serious credit event, a bond priced near $100 can fall to $40, $30, or $20. In other words, fixed income has an asymmetric risk profile.
That asymmetry changes the manager's task. Avoiding a bond that does not adequately compensate for its risk can matter as much as finding one with incremental yield. An index does not make that judgment; it owns the market according to preset rules, and the largest debt issuers generally receive the largest weights. An active manager can ask a more practical question: are we being paid for the risk we are taking?
This is also why we resist chasing yield or chasing a headline return. The extra income has to survive scrutiny of the issuer, the collateral, the structure and the downside. In core bonds, pragmatism is a feature, not a lack of ambition.
Inflation will determine whether this is an income story, or more
The hardest call today is not the direction of credit spreads; it is the direction of inflation. With growth still resilient, companies are generally operating from a position of strength, and we do not see an obvious catalyst for broad credit deterioration. Government yields are where most of the volatility resides.
From here, we see three plausible paths. If inflation cools faster than the market expects and the Federal Reserve can begin easing policy, bonds could deliver meaningful price appreciation on top of income as government bond yields move lower. If inflation stays near current levels and the Fed remains on the sidelines, returns are more likely to come from carry. The more difficult outcome would be renewed inflation, which could push government yields higher and cause already-tight credit spreads to widen.
Our base case leans toward inflation cooling eventually, but conviction should not be confused with certainty. That argues for a modest duration position rather than a heroic one. It also argues for owning shorter-duration spread assets that can generate incremental income and help offset modest weakness from government bonds if rates remain volatile. The current shape of the yield curve adds another consideration: today’s positively sloped government yield curve means that a slightly longer duration stance can provide additional carry from rolling down the curve even if yields do not move lower.
Where we see relative value
We currently find some of the more interesting opportunities in non-agency securitized assets. Many are shorter-duration, floating-rate securities that offer income over front-end Treasuries. But this is not a sector to buy indiscriminately. The investment case depends on detailed analysis of the underlying collateral, the capital structure and how cash flows behave under stress.
Investment-grade corporate bonds also offer incremental yield over government securities, although tight spreads make selection important. We have moved modestly down in quality within carefully chosen spread sectors to capture additional income, while remaining mindful that this is still a core portfolio.
Agency mortgage-backed securities are less compelling to us on a relative-value basis after their recent strength. We are not avoiding the sector entirely; we see better compensation in other high-quality areas, including selected investment-grade corporates and non-agency securitized credit. Active management is often less about declaring a sector ‘good’ or ‘bad’ than comparing what each one is offering today.
New issuance: supply can create opportunity
The step-up in corporate issuance, particularly from large technology companies funding artificial-intelligence investment, has attracted attention for good reason. A concentrated wave of supply can briefly pressure prices and widen spreads, as it did when several large technology deals reached the market close together.
But that is also the natural ebb and flow of a healthy primary market. Prices adjust until buyers are willing to absorb the bonds. Demand has remained robust, and we believe the market can digest additional issuance, although borrowers may have to offer slightly lower prices or wider spreads when supply is heavy. For selective investors, those concessions can create entry points rather than signal a structural problem.
What investors should expect from core
At today's yields, fixed income once again offers a credible combination of income and potential portfolio protection. Short-term volatility is likely as markets reassess inflation and the policy response, but investors are being paid more to wait than they were during the long low-rate era. If inflation moderates, current yields may also be accompanied by capital appreciation.
The strongest case for a core strategy is not that it will predict every turn in rates or spreads. It is that it does not need every decision to rest on the same forecast. Sector rotation, security selection and duration positioning can provide distinct sources of return and risk control. In a market where the most important variable is also the hardest to call, that flexibility, exercised with discipline, is exactly what an anchor should provide.
Laura Lake, CFA, is managing director and senior portfolio manager at Payden & Rygel. Tim Crawmer, CFA, is a director and global credit strategist at Payden & Rygel.
This material reflects the firm’s current opinion and is subject to change without notice. Sources for the material contained herein are deemed reliable but cannot be guaranteed. This material is for illustrative purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to sell or buy any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.
© Payden & Rygel
Read more commentaries by Payden & Rygel
