Build a Better Path, Part Two: Three-Dimensional Investing





In part two of AB’s “Build a Better Path” Disruptor SeriesTM, we shifted from diagnosing the challenge of long-term investing to a potential approach for solving it. With practical, actionable steps, investors have the potential to translate the concept of improving up/down capture into strategies aimed at improving portfolio design. Here’s a summary of the discussion.

See more: US Stocks: Margin Math Tests the Earnings Story

A Third Investing Dimension: The Sequence of Returns

As we discussed in part one of “Build a Better Path,” enhanced up/down capture offers a potential avenue for improving the path of portfolio returns. But to do that, investors must take a broader perspective to assessing risk and return.

Think of a typical scatter plot that arranges investments by their average volatility and average return along X and Y axes, respectively. In looking to improve the path of returns, we think it makes sense to add a third dimension—let’s call it “Z.” This variable describes the order of investment returns over time. If we think about it this way, improving portfolio design becomes about more than return and volatility—it also involves seeking to improve the sequence of portfolio returns.

Two portfolios could have the same average return and similar volatility but deliver very different outcomes if one has a more favorable return path—for example, a less severe downturn if a bear market happens early on. As we see it, a key element in that better sequence is designing a strategy with better up/down capture. The good news is that there are concrete steps to take: identify better betas, assemble them efficiently and incorporate sources of alpha.