Dispelling Three Election Cycle Myths That Can Undermine Investment Success

With the US presidential election quickly approaching, each day seems to bring more information about each candidate’s political agenda. We can understand why investors on both sides of the aisle might expect the outcome to impact financial markets. But the historical record suggests that elections may have less influence on markets than you think.

Here we dispel three common myths about elections and investments, demonstrating why we think sticking to a long-term investment plan might be a better path to success than trying to predict political cycles.

Myth 1: Stocks outperform during election years

False.

To refute this myth, we looked at the performance of the S&P 500 Index going back to 1928, which covers the last 24 presidential elections.

S&P 500 price return during election years

S&P 500 price return during election years