Hurricanes End 83-Month Employment Expansion

That said, there are two main watch outs that bear monitoring closely:

First, employment growth has been decelerating from over 2% last year to 1.4%, even before hurricanes Harvey and Irma. It's not alarming but it is worth noting that expansions weaken before they end and slowing employment growth is a sign of late-stage maturation in the current expansion.

A second watch out is demand growth. Real retail sales growth (excluding gas) was 1.0% yoy August. This too may reflect the affect of Harvey and Irma, as growth was 1.9% in July. Personal consumption accounts for about 70% of GDP so retail sales has a notable impact on the economy.

Here are the main macro data headlines from the past month:

Employment: Monthly employment gains have averaged 175,000 during the past year, with annual growth of 1.4% yoy. Employment has been been driven by full-time jobs, which rose to a new all-time high in September.

Compensation: Compensation growth is on an improving trend and at the highest level in the past 8 years - 2.9% yoy in September.

Demand: Real demand growth has been 2-3%. In August, real personal consumption growth was 2.5%. Real retail sales (including gas) grew 1.2% yoy in August after making a new ATH in July.

Housing: Housing sales fell 1% yoy in August after making a 9-1/2 year high in March. Starts and permits are flat over the past two years due to weakness in multi-family units.

Manufacturing: Core durable goods growth rose 6.7% yoy in August. The manufacturing component of industrial production grew 1.6% yoy in August.

Inflation: The core inflation rate remains near (but under) the Fed's 2% target.

Our key message over the past 5 years has been that (a) growth is positive but slow, in the range of ~2-3% (real), and; (b) current growth is lower than in prior periods of economic expansion and a return to 1980s or 1990s style growth does not appear likely.

This is germane to equity markets in that macro growth drives corporate revenue, profit expansion and valuation levels. The simple fact is that equity bear markets almost always take place within the context of an economic decline. Since the end of World War II, there have been 10 bear markets, only 2 of which have occurred outside of an economic recession (read further here).

The highly misleading saying that "the stock market is not the economy" is true on a day to day or even month to month basis, but over time these two move together. When they diverge, it is normally a function of emotion, whether measured in valuation premiums/discounts or sentiment extremes.

Macro data should continue to be better than expected in 2H17. Why? Macro data was ahead of expectations to start the current year. During the current expansion, that has led to underperformance of macro data relative to expectations into mid-year and then outperformance in the second half of the year (green shading). 2009 and 2016 had the opposite pattern: these years began with macro data outperforming expectations into mid-and then underperforming in the second half (yellow shading).

Let's review the most recent data, focusing on four macro categories: labor market, end-demand, housing, and inflation.


Employment and Wages

The September non-farm payroll was negative 33,000 new employees less 38,000 in revisions for the prior two months. The fall in new employment this month ended the 83 month expansion, the longest stretch in history. Payrolls were obviously impacted by hurricanes Harvey and Irma.

In the past 12 months, the average monthly gain in employment was 148,000; prior to September, the average was 175,000. Even before the recent hurricanes, employment growth had been decelerating.

Monthly NFP prints are normally volatile. Since the 1990s, NFP prints near 300,000 have been followed by ones near or under 100,000. That has been a pattern during every bull market; NFP was negative in 1993, 1995, 1996 and 1997. The low print of 50,000 in March 2017, 43,000 in May 2016 and in the past month fit the historical pattern. This is normal, not unusual or unexpected.

Why is there so much volatility? Leave aside the data collection, seasonal adjustment and weather issues; appreciate that a "beat" or a "miss" of 80,000 workers in a monthly NFP report is equal to just 0.05% of the US workforce.

For this reason, it's better to look at the trend; in August, trend employment growth was 1.4% yoy (post-hurricanes in September, growth fell to 1.2% yoy). Until spring 2016, annual growth had been over 2%, the highest since the 1990s. Ahead of a recession, employment growth normally falls (arrows). Continued deceleration in employment growth in the coming months continues to be an important watch out.

Employment has been been driven by full-time jobs, which rose to a new all-time high in September (blue line), not part-time jobs (red line).

The labor force participation rate (the percentage of the population over 16 that is either working or looking for work) had been falling but has more recently stabilized, rising to a 4-year high in September. The participation rate has been falling since 2001 as baby boomers retire, exactly as participation started to rise in the mid-1960s as this group entered the workforce. Another driver is women, whose participation rate increased from about 30% in the 1950s to a peak of 60% in 1999.

Average hourly earnings growth was 2.9% yoy in September, the highest in 8 years. This is a positive trend, showing demand for more workers. Sustained acceleration in wages would be a big positive for consumption and investment that would further fuel employment.

Similarly, 2Q17 employment cost index shows compensation growth was 2.4% yoy.

For those who doubt the accuracy of the BLS employment data, federal tax receipts have also been rising to new highs (red line), a sign of better employment and wages (from Yardeni).

Demand

Regardless of which data is used, real demand has been growing at about 2-3%, equal to about 4-5% nominal. Some of the monthly data for August was likely impacted by Hurricane Harvey.

Real (inflation adjusted) GDP growth through 2Q17 was 2.2% yoy. 2.5-5% was common during prior expansionary periods prior to 2006.

Stripping out the changes in GDP due to inventory produces "real final sales". This is a better measure of consumption growth than total GDP. In 2Q17, this grew 2.2% yoy. A sustained break above 2.5% would be noteworthy.

The "real personal consumption expenditures" component of GDP (defined), which accounts for about 70% of GDP, grew at 2.7% yoy in 2Q17. This is approaching the 3-5% that was common in prior expansionary periods after 1980.

On a monthly basis, the growth in real personal consumption expenditures was 2.5% yoy in August.

GDP measures the total expenditures in the economy. An alternative measure is GDI (gross domestic income), which measures the total income in the economy. Since every expenditure produces income, these are equivalent measurements of the economy. A growing body of research suggests that GDI might be more accurate than GDP (here).

Real GDI growth in 2Q17 was 2.0% yoy.

Real retail sales reached a new all-time high in July; in August, annual growth was 1.2% yoy. The range has generally been centered around 2.5% yoy for most of the past 20 years.

Retail sales in the past two years have been strongly affected by the large fall and rebound in the price of gasoline. In August, real retail sales at gasoline stations grew by 4.3% yoy after having fallen more than 20% yoy during 2016. Real retail sales excluding gas stations grew 1.0% in August. This has been on a weakening trend even before the recent hurricanes.

The next several slides look at manufacturing. It's important to note that manufacturing accounts for less than 10% of US employment, so these measures are of lesser importance.

Core durable goods orders (excluding military, so that it measures consumption, and transportation, which is highly volatile) rose 6.7% yoy (nominal) in August. March had the best annual growth rate since mid-2014. Weakness in durable goods has not been a useful predictor of broader economic weakness in the past (arrows).

Industrial production (real manufacturing, mining and utility output) growth was 1.5% yoy in August. The more important manufacturing component (excluding mining and oil/gas extraction; red line) rose 1.6% yoy. This is a volatile series: manufacturing growth was lower at points in 2014 than it was in 2016 before rebounding strongly.

Housing

New housing sales fell 1% yoy in August. Housing starts and permits are flat over the past two years due to weakness in multi-family units. Overall levels of construction and sales are small relative to prior bull markets, but the trend is higher.

First, new single family houses sold was 560,000 in August; March sales were at the highest level in the past 10 years and August was not much lower. Growth in August fell 1% over the past year after growing 11% yoy in August 2016.

Second, housing starts are flat over the past two years. Starts rose 1% yoy in August.

Building permits are also flat over the past two years (red line). Permits grew 8% yoy in August.

The weakness in starts (and permits) is in the multi-unit category. Single family housing starts (blue line) reached a new post-recession high in February and was only marginally lower in August. Meanwhile. multi-unit housing starts (red line) was flat over the past four years; this has been a drag on overall starts.

Inflation

Despite steady employment, demand and housing growth, inflation remains stuck near (but under) the Fed's target of 2%.

CPI (blue line) was 1.9% last month. The more important core CPI (excluding volatile food and energy; red line) grew 1.7%, the lowest rate in 2 years (since February 2015).

The Fed prefers to use personal consumption expenditures (PCE) to measure inflation; total and core PCE were 1.4% and 1.3% yoy, respectively, last month. February was the first (and only) month since 2Q 2012 that total PCE was above 2%.

Some mistrust CPI and PCE. MIT publishes an independent price index (called the billion prices index; yellow line). It has tracked both CPI (blue line) and PCE closely.

Summary

In summary, the major macro data so far suggest positive, but slow, growth. This is consistent with corporate sales growth. SPX sales growth in 2017 is expected to only be about 5% (nominal).

With valuations now well above average, the current pace of growth is likely to be the limiting factor for equity appreciation. This is important, as the consensus expects earnings to grow about 10% in 2017 (chart from Yardeni).

Read more commentaries by The Fat Pitch