What Wine Taught Me About Investor Risk Tolerance

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

As a financial advisor, I used to ask questions designed to help determine how much investment risk clients are comfortable taking.

When I began seriously studying wine, I discovered something interesting: People often misunderstand their own preferences in wine for the same reason investors misunderstand their tolerance for risk.

They know what they think they like.

Until they experience it.

Ask someone what kind of wine they prefer, and the answer may come quickly: Napa Cab, dry whites, perhaps anything but Chardonnay. But put several wines in front of that same person in a blind tasting, and the results can be surprising.

The wine they expected to love may finish near the bottom. The inexpensive bottle they would have overlooked on a store shelf may become their favorite. Remove the label, reputation, price, and expectations, and people are left with something much more revealing: their actual experience.

Investors face a remarkably similar problem.

Risk Tolerance Is Easy in Theory

Most investors have encountered some version of a risk questionnaire: How would you react if your portfolio declined 10%? What about 20%? How long is your investment time horizon? Would you describe yourself as conservative, moderate, or aggressive?

These are necessary questions. But there’s a limitation: Answering a hypothetical question about loss is very different from experiencing it.

A 20% decline on paper is an abstraction. Watching years of accumulated savings fall by hundreds of thousands of dollars while financial news grows increasingly pessimistic is an experience.

The difference reminds me of tasting wine. Someone may confidently say they love wines with lots of tannins. But after tasting one, they may discover that they actually prefer something softer and more approachable.

The preference was theoretical. The experience made it real. Investor risk tolerance works much the same way. A person can be intellectually comfortable with volatility and deeply uncomfortable with it emotionally. The advisor’s job is to understand the difference before markets expose it.

The Label Changes the Experience

Wine offers another useful lesson about investor behavior: expectations matter.

Price, scores, producers, and regions all influence what people expect from a bottle of wine before the cork is pulled. That doesn’t mean those things are meaningless. They provide useful information — but they can also create bias.

Investing has its own labels, like “safe,” growth, conservative, alternative, or high quality. Investors can react to the description of an investment before fully understanding the experience of owning it.

A client may say they want growth until they experience the volatility that can accompany it. Another may insist on safety until they understand what excessive conservatism could mean for purchasing power over a long retirement.

The question for advisors is not simply, “What does this client say they want?” It is also, “What experience are they actually prepared to live through?”

That distinction matters because a portfolio can be both mathematically appropriate and behaviorally impossible for a client to maintain. A strategy that cannot be maintained during difficult periods may not be appropriate at all.

Ask Better Questions

A good sommelier rarely begins a conversation by asking a guest to explain acidity, tannin structure, or residual sugar.

Instead, the questions are more approachable:

What have you enjoyed before?
What do you normally drink?
Do you want something familiar or would you like to try something different?
What are you eating?

The sommelier learns about the person before recommending a bottle.

Financial advisors can do the same. Instead of relying exclusively on questions about percentages and hypothetical losses, we can ask clients about experiences:

How did you feel during the last major market decline?
Did you make changes to your portfolio?
What financial decision have you regretted most?
When markets become volatile, what worries you most: losing money, missing an opportunity, or not knowing what to do?
What would cause you to abandon an investment plan?

Those answers may reveal more about a client’s true relationship with risk than selecting a number on a questionnaire.

Risk Is Personal

One of the most liberating lessons in wine is that palates are personal.

A critic can give a wine 98 points. A friend can insist that a particular bottle is extraordinary. A restaurant can price it accordingly. You still may not like it.

Investing is more complicated because outcomes have real financial consequences, but the underlying lesson remains valuable: The right strategy must fit the individual.

Two investors of the same age, with similar incomes and comparable portfolios, may have very different capacities and tolerances for risk. One may view volatility as temporary and remain focused on long-term goals, while the other may lose sleep during every correction.

Giving both investors identical portfolios simply because their financial profiles look similar ignores an important part of the advisory relationship. Risk tolerance isn’t merely a score. It is a combination of financial capacity, experience, expectations, personality, and emotion. Understanding it requires conversation.

The Advisor as Guide

The best wine professionals I’ve encountered don’t try to demonstrate everything they know. Instead, they use what they know to help someone else make a better decision. There is an important lesson in that for financial professionals.

Clients have access to more investment information, products, opinions, and market commentary than ever before. The challenge is rarely a shortage of information. Often, it is the opposite.

The advisor’s value increasingly lies in helping clients interpret choices, understand trade-offs, and make decisions they can live with when circumstances become uncomfortable.

That includes helping clients understand their own risk tolerance more clearly. Not the risk tolerance they believe they have during a rising market. Not the answer they think they are supposed to give. Their actual tolerance for uncertainty, volatility, and loss.

A good wine tasting can reveal preferences people didn’t know they had, and a good advisory process should do the same. Because the most important time to discover that a client’s portfolio exceeds their tolerance for risk is not after the market has fallen. It is before the bottle is opened.

Michael Kane is a financial advisor with over 20 years of experience and author of the upcoming book, Decanted Wisdom, which explores the striking parallels between wine, investing, and human behavior. His writing focuses on making complex financial concepts more approachable through stories, practical experience, and the familiar lens of wine. He’s based in North Texas and can be reached at [email protected].

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.