Should Companies Report Earnings Less Often? The Debate Between Long-Term Growth & Transparency
Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.
Public companies could be looking at fewer earnings calls. The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering a proposal that would allow eligible public companies to replace quarterly reporting requirements with semi-annual updates. While supporters say the move could strengthen long-term growth, others worry less reporting could mean less transparency between companies and shareholders.
Those in favor of the proposal largely argue that quarterly reporting prioritizes short-term thinking. Because earnings are closely analyzed every three months, many executives often face pressure to meet the expectations of both analysts and investors, or risk a significant drop in value.
Sometimes, that pressure can influence business decisions that could delay long-term goals such as growth and expansion efforts, pause research and development, or eliminate personnel, simply because making a choice could have a negative impact on short-term earnings. Those in favor of semi-annual reporting believe companies will have more time to focus on creating long-term value and sustainable growth. While that may be true, it can also create more risk, particularly for investors.
Sacrificing Transparency?
Semi-annual reports may reduce pressure on upper management, but critics argue less reporting could come at the expense of transparency. Quarterly reports give investors insight into the company’s financial standing on a consistent basis. Cutting reporting requirements in half could make it much more difficult to identify emerging opportunities or risks before they become significant. A company experiencing financial hardship or leadership challenges may show warning signs over the course of a quarter that could otherwise be missed under a looser reporting structure.
Beyond a lack of transparency, reducing reporting requirements could negatively impact some firms more than others. Large institutional firms on Wall Street usually have access to proprietary research, alternative data sources, or extensive analyst networks. Independent advisors, however, tend to rely heavily on publicly available information when making investment decisions.
Moving to a semi-annual reporting system could make it very difficult for smaller firms to identify shifts within a company. Meanwhile, larger institutions would simply continue to use private research and data sources.
