SEC Staff to Investment Advisors: Fiduciary is “Extraneous”
Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives
The Supreme Court held in 1963 the fiduciary standard is the bedrock of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Now, however, the SEC staff has issued a statement saying to investment advisers that their fiduciary status is “extraneous.”
This opinion is stunning but unsurprising. For more than 20 years, broker-dealers have advertised that they provide ”trusted advice” (read: fiduciary) but have vigorously opposed being held to a fiduciary standard. Indeed, they have erased the line between fiduciary advice and brokerage trading or product distribution.
The result has been a bamboozled and befuddled marketplace that financial planner Dan Moisand called a “freak show” in 2018.
This latest SEC staff intervention effectively said, ”Forget the Supreme Court and prior SEC opinions. We have a better idea.” The idea is that, since broker-dealers reject the higher fiduciary standard, investment advisers must do likewise. They must tell investors they meet the lower broker-dealer conduct standard.
If SEC’s dictum were a piece of congressional legislation, it could be called ”The Equity in Conduct Standards Act, 2022.”
The SEC chair and its commissioners today are the most fiduciary-centric in the last 25 years. Yet, on March 30, the staff said the word fiduciary is out on Form CRS. CRS is a two-page disclosure that is meant to help investors tell the difference between brokers and advisers.