Nicole Kidman's Hong Kong Should Be for Everyone: Anjani Trivedi

Nicole Kidman's arrival in Hong Kong has created a stir, and not just because of her celebrity status. The city is alight with rage because the Hollywood actress was exempt from the territory's stringent quarantine rules. Instead of holing up in a hotel for 21 days, Kidman has been whisked around the city, busy filming scenes for a new television series.

Understandable as residents’ frustration may be, Hong Kong should have more exemptions, not fewer of them. Exercised impartially and reasonably, such measures could be a smart way to open up travel — just the pressure valve cooped-up city-dwellers need.

It’s fair to ask why Kidman should benefit from an exemption — as opposed to, say, a family of five with young children — and it isn’t entirely clear which one she qualifies for. Exceptions to the rule often create feelings of injustice. But while the actress has benefited from her special status, she isn’t the only one. Various permissions for all sorts of people have been in place for over a year. What makes Kidman any different from a director of a publicly listed company or a livestock importer living in the mainland? Both would also qualify.

Hong Kong’s exemption rules exist because this arrangement is “essential for maintaining the necessary operation of society and the economy, and for ensuring an uninterrupted supply of all daily necessities to the public," according to the territory’s Covid-19 portal. In their current incarnation, though, these measures seem more like arbitrary loopholes waiting to be exploited. (Since when was filming a TV series a "necessary operation"?) It’s worth asking whether the government has been able to define what these guidelines are supposed to mean for the city’s 7.5 million residents, when some of its Covid-prevention tactics end up causing more harm than good. Policy flip-flops have thrown travelers’ plans into disarray with little warning and consideration, and many families remain separated.