A Strategy for Reducing Volatility While Increasing Returns

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

The product on every advisor’s wish list would have the low volatility of fixed income while providing equity-like returns. Although such a product does not exist, equity options, when used properly, will give you the ability to achieve pre-defined goals and objectives.

During a press conference on June 19th, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke presented a tentative timeline for the winding down the Fed’s $85 billion-per-month bond-buying program, and initiated a violent sell off in the US equity market. With the stage set for interest rates to rise, investors are beginning to realize that they have to look beyond fixed income and find new ways to lower the volatility of their portfolios and generate yield.

Generations of investors and financial advisers have relied on the 60/40 asset allocation model which calls for a portfolio with 60% invested in stocks and 40% in high-quality bonds with regular rebalancing to keep the portfolio properly weighted. In a rising interest rate environment, it is unlikely that this asset allocation will produce the same historical returns we have seen in the last three decades.

A growing number of advisers are adding options strategies to their clients’ portfolios with the goal of lowering volatility and generating income. One of the easiest ways to introduce your clients to options is through covered-call writing – selling call options against long positions held in one’s portfolio. This strategy provides your client with a steady flow of income while reducing some of their downside risk. The amount of upside you forfeit using this strategy will depend on the strike price of the option you choose to sell.

To determine whether covered-call writing is appropriate, it is important to understand what your client is trying to achieve. A client that falls on the low-risk end of the spectrum and whose main objective is income generation is probably comfortable with giving up the majority of the upside in exchange for generating greater yield. On the other hand, a growth-oriented investor who has a more bullish outlook would likely be more comfortable in generating lower yield in exchange for the ability to participate in more of the upside.