Gundlach: Illiquid Assets Don’t Belong in Liquid Vehicles

While many in the financial industry have lauded the expansion of the ETF vehicle as a significant step toward democratization, particularly for making previously inaccessible assets like cryptocurrency and private credit available to a broader range of individual investors, renowned investor Jeffrey Gundlach holds a contrarian view.

Integrating volatile and illiquid assets into the ETF structure is something to be avoided, DoubleLine CEO and CIO Gundlach said in response to a question about the increasing proliferation of bitcoin ETFs during the DoubleLine Total Return Webcast on June 10.

Gundlach's concern stems from the potential for these novel ETF offerings to introduce systemic risks and liquidity mismatches. This would ultimately harm the very investors these products aim to empower. The ease of access provided by the ETF wrapper might mask the inherent complexities and risks of the underlying assets. This could lead to uninformed investment decisions and potential market instability.

Complex Products Are Rarely Brought to the ETF Market in Time to Capture Performance

When an asset class that was previously reserved for institutional investors suddenly becomes retail-oriented, it typically happens following a period of strong outperformance, according to Gundlach.

This is often presented as a great opportunity for the small Main Street investor. However, as the industry saying goes, "Past performance is no guarantee of future success." Buying an asset after it has already appreciated is essentially chasing momentum. For individual investors, this usually occurs closer to the end of a market move, not the beginning, Gundlach said.

“I do think it's a poor idea to take illiquid products – and I would say bitcoin is quite illiquid just given its daily volatility at times – and put them into liquid vehicles,” Gundlach said. “You're putting a square peg in a round hole.”