This week continues the temporary ceasefire in the trade war, with many tariffs on a 90-day delay. But market volatility is likely to return as we get an early read on theoretical updates from global economic forecasting organizations and real-world impacts of the trade war from global corporations' earnings reports and guidance.
Theoretical forecasts
Last week, the head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) gave a warning that the global economy will slow due to the U.S.-led trade war but noted that a global recession is not in the forecast. The IMF is scheduled to release new forecasts in its World Economic Outlook on Tuesday, April 22, when we will get the details on the impact to each country. Their forecasts are likely to include a downgrade for global growth with North American economies expected to take the biggest hits.
The IMF's last semi-annual analysis report, published in October of last year, analyzed the potential impact of U.S. tariffs, which were then assumed to be across the board 10% tariffs, tariffs and retaliation by all countries at a rate of 10%, which resulted in only a small -0.1% impact on global growth with the biggest drag (-0.4%) felt in the United States. The much higher tariffs both implemented and proposed in 2025 will likely worsen the magnitude of the economic impacts coming out of last fall's analysis.
The original IMF forecast was similar to a report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), another international institution focused on facilitating economic growth and stability, published just last month. With total exports to the U.S. from all other countries only accounting for 5% of non-U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), the OECD estimates that a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and exports would reduce U.S. GDP by seven times more than in China, three times more than in the eurozone, with a bigger impact on U.S. inflation than elsewhere, as you can see illustrated in the chart below. This analysis was further supported by the World Trade Organization report published last week that foresees a stall in global merchandise trade this year (-0.2%) driven by a large drop in North American exports of -12%.
Direct impact of trade war varies across countries
The worsening U.S. outlook compared to major trading partners may have helped prompt the 90-day delay in some tariffs announced on April 9th and could urge the Trump administration to cut bi-lateral deals in the interim time. The administration expressed positive sentiments about its tariff talks last week with the United Kingdom, Japan, and European Union.
Real world incentives
The theoretical forecasts may be directionally correct, but it's important to take all these seemingly precise estimates of the impact of tariffs with skepticism, in part because we don't know how successfully the tariffs will be avoided in the real world. The incentives to avoid tariffs are very high with China tariffs over 100% but only 10% or less on neighboring countries where Chinese businesses have subsidiaries.
One way to avoid tariffs is by transshipping from China to an intermediary country such as Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand and then on to the U.S., thus paying a much lower tariff rate—something the data indicates China has been doing increasingly since tariffs on Chinese produced goods were levied in 2017, during President Donald Trump's first term. In fact, the data shows the rise in the U.S. imports from those three countries since before the 2018-19 tariffs were implemented is the same amount China's exports to those three countries has increased. And it's a lot—about $15 billion per month over the past year. Adding that to the $45 billion in direct monthly exports from China to the U.S. each month suggests 25% of China's exports are being transshipped through these countries to avoid tariffs. That percentage is likely to increase unless the tariff rates change.
China re-routing exports to the U.S. via Southeast Asia since start of 2018-19 Trump tariffs
Another way to avoid tariffs is to under-invoice the value of Chinese goods. The under-invoicing began with the first rounds of Trump tariffs on China in 2018-19, which were maintained and widened under Biden. Since then, the value of imports claimed in the U.S. has gone from being higher than what was claimed to be exported from China. The blue line in the chart below shows the over-invoicing to get money out of China prior to the 2018-19 tariffs shifting to being more than $100 billion below on under-invoicing in the U.S. presumably to avoid tariffs. In percentage terms, this means that currently 20% of the value of China's exports to the U.S. are not being accounted for in the U.S. imports data.
U.S. imports from China may be already under-reported by around $100 billion
Taking both these actions together, it may be that nearly 50% of China's exports to the U.S. are already avoiding the full tariffs. Chinese exporters and US importers are facing big and increasing incentives to do so. Risks to growth, inflation and profit margins from the high China tariffs may be somewhat mitigated by the avenues of avoidance.
Earnings reality
So, let's set these projections aside for the moment and look at the real-world implications of the tariffs so far. The trade war may be in a temporary ceasefire, but earnings reports are shedding light on the effects of the initial salvos of Trump's trade war are having on business activities. Firms in industries including construction, apparel, and luxury goods did disclose some inventory increases were made (confirmed on earnings calls by shipping companies CSX and JB Hunt) in anticipation of increased costs but were careful to not rule out the possibility of price increases or applying tariff surcharges later in the year. While many companies are taking a wait-and-see approach to the impact, last week's comments from business leaders included:
- Discount retailer Five Below asked vendors to cancel shipments of products waiting in China before they set off for the United States.
- Luxury product maker LVMH said tariff talks weighed on demand, noting soft U.S. sales.
- United Airlines offered guidance to analysts that included two scenarios driven by "light" and "heavy" tariffs.
- Also, an inventory write-down showed the impact of non-tariff restrictions on Nvidia's chip exports to China.
While earnings are at risk and there are typically no absolute winners in a trade war, we continue to favor international diversification with an emphasis on Europe. European stocks have recovered all of their April 2 "Liberation Day" losses, as you can see in the chart below. Not so for U.S.'s S&P 500. This isn't simply because of the poor performance of the U.S.'s Magnificent Seven since the equal-weighted indexes show a similar gap. This illustrates it isn't just a handful of mega cap stocks that account for the difference in performance, the average stock in Europe has been outperforming the average U.S. stock.
European stocks have fully recovered their April 2 "Liberation Day" losses
A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: To learn more about this and other topics, check out some of our webcasts.
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.
Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author's views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author's opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions.
All corporate names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy.
Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results, and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.
Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets.
Investing in emerging markets may accentuate this risk.
Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.
The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions
BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively "Bloomberg"). Bloomberg or Bloomberg's licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg's licensors approves or endorses this material or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.
The MSCI EMU Equal Weighted Index represents an alternative weighting scheme to its market cap weighted parent index, the MSCI EMU Index. At each quarterly rebalance date, all index constituents are re-weighted equally, effectively removing the influence of each constituent's current price (high or low). Between rebalances, index constituent weightings will fluctuate due to price performance.
The S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index represents an alternative weighting scheme to its market cap weighted parent index, the S&P 500 Index. At each quarterly rebalance date, all index constituents are re-weighted equally, effectively removing the influence of each constituent's current price (high or low). Between rebalances, index constituent weightings will fluctuate due to price performance.
© Charles Schwab
More Asian/European Markets Topics >
