Rebuilding Resilience in 60/40 Portfolios

Key points

  • Heightened fiscal, trade, and policy dynamics challenge the performance, stability, and diversification potential of 60/40 portfolios.
  • Strategies that look beyond directional market opportunities to take advantage of return sources of dispersion in idiosyncratic risk may help rebuild portfolio resilience.
  • We highlight two strategies as potentially better ways to play stocks (BDMIX) and bonds (BIMBX) in this new regime.

The 60/40 portfolio, where 60% is invested in stocks and 40% in bonds, is the initial starting point for many portfolios. The exact asset mix is often adjusted based on an investor’s time horizon, risk tolerance, and financial goals, but the simple, proportional stock-bond combination is what is often considered a “balanced” portfolio.

But in recent years, the driving forces behind the success of the 60/40 have come under pressure, first with post-COVID inflation uncertainty, and today with heightened fiscal, trade, and policy changes. What does this mean for portfolio construction? Rebuilding portfolio resilience may require more dynamic alternatives to traditional stock and bond allocations.

The 60/40 portfolio today

The shift to a world of higher overall interest rate volatility amid greater macroeconomic, policy, and market uncertainty is shaping a new regime for investing. The below chart highlights the impact on 60/40 portfolio outcomes, showing reduced return potential and increased volatility over the last three years relative to the previous decade.

60 40 portfolio