Thematic Investing: Tomorrow’s Themes, Today

The case for thematic investing

Thematic investing has grown in prominence as a way for investors to align portfolios with the evolving trends shaping the future economy. Over the last 10 years, assets managed in the U.S.-listed thematic funds have grown nearly ten times from $9.7bn in 2014 to $92.7bn in 2024.1

Themes can be described as topics that are front-of-mind for investors, persist over time, and have demonstrated an ability to drive equity market returns. We define themes as meeting three criteria:

  • Themes are dynamic. The top themes driving markets are constantly shifting, requiring a timely and scalable approach to identify the most important themes in equity markets today.
  • Themes impact generally unrelated companies. Capturing thematic alpha2 requires anticipating new linkages across stocks. The traditional groupings by sector, industry, or country may overlook the cross-market returns driven by themes.
  • Themes have the potential to drive meaningful returns. Investors need a framework for evaluating the return potential of themes while seeking to allocate across the strongest opportunity set.

We can begin to understand how themes evolve by assessing the attention they receive using natural language processing (NLP) techniques. By nature, themes create a persistent flow of news. They can be topics that investors are researching, corporate officers are addressing in conference calls, the press is publishing, and government officials are often responding to. Leveraging these text sources, we aim to quantify the flow of information to determine a theme’s relevance and life span.

Take for example the release of ChatGPT in late 2022. We view artificial intelligence as a persistent structural theme that will drive innovation for years to come. However, the launch of this consumer-facing technology led all aspects of the AI value chain—from GPUs and large language models to data centers and power generation—to surge in popularity.3 Figure 1 shows how we measure this with a proprietary attention score which currently exceeds historical highs of “big data”, “clean tech”, and “SPACs,” and is only modestly below “credit defaults” in the Great Financial Crisis (GFC).

figure 1