What Happened to ESG Stocks?
Investments in alternative energy have become unattractive due to higher interest rates, not changes in government policies, adoption or pricing of green technologies.
While Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) investment screens based on corporate policies mean different things to different people, for investors the term is probably most closely associated with "green" or alternative sources of energy to address sustainability and climate concerns.
The lead-up to the 2020 U.S. elections saw alternative energy stocks outperform traditional energy stocks by a very wide margin, as you can see in the chart below. Progress on Europe's Green Deal and candidate Biden's emphasis on climate initiatives gave these stocks a big boost, especially relative to traditional energy companies. Over the subsequent three years, the performance gap has been completely erased. What happened?
Trends in clean energy
What didn't happen was that the trends favoring alternative energy did not fade away. In fact, the broad trends in terms of policy, adoption, and pricing continue.
- According to the International Energy Agency, global investment in clean energy is expected to rise to $1.7 trillion this year, with investments in solar projects eclipsing oil exploration and production.
- The European Green Deal, a package of initiatives to cut greenhouse gas emissions and direct investment toward sustainability was adopted in 2021.
- The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act was passed in 2022, arguably the most significant climate legislation in U.S. history, offering funding, programs, and incentives to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. As of July 31, 2023 the U.S. has announced over $270 billion in capital investments, equal to the total investments commissioned between 2015-2022, according to a report by American Clean Power.
- Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, headlines heralded a "return to coal," dirtying up Europe's green energy future. Well, the rise in coal use in 2022 seen in the chart below is turning out to be a blip. In August 2023, year-over-year coal-power generation declined 39%, replaced by wind, solar, and hydroelectric power. Coal fell to its lowest share of power generation since at least 1990, according to data from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clear Air (CREA). More than 50% of power production now comes from renewable sources, more than double that of 10 years ago.
- China's massive annual growth in coal-power generation has helped drive the country's soaring carbon output over the past decade. But, in September 2023, hydroelectric power had the second-best year-over-year growth among all major industrial products in China, second only to the 39% growth rate of solar panels, according to industrial output data from the National Bureau of Statistics. It's possible that China may experience its second year in a row of falling carbon emissions and be closer to its pledge of a peak in emissions by 2030 as it incorporates more sources of alternative power.
- Finally, traditional energy prices have remained high around the world, with a further surge this year as the supply of oil from OPEC+ has been cut. The global benchmark for crude oil, Brent, is around $90 per barrel—more than double the price in mid-2020 when the alternative energy stocks began to soar—and remains well above its 10-year average.
Given all those trends, it would seem that alternative energy stocks should be thriving. Instead, they are among the world's worst performers this year. What changed? Interest rates.
While government mandates are driving investment, private sector demand has slumped on higher borrowing costs for homeowners. On Friday, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. warned that third-quarter revenue will be well below its guidance, citing "substantial" cancellations and delayed orders. On Wednesday, Tesla, Inc. reported solar deployments dropped for the third consecutive quarter.
Higher interest rates are impacting these companies' finances. The stocks in the MSCI World Alternative Energy Index have a leverage ratio of 3.8, based on debt-to-12-month earnings, compared with just 1.1 for the five biggest energy producers by market capitalization. That means higher financing costs are much more costly for these companies.
Higher interest rates are also pushing down valuations of these stocks. When it comes to determining the price of stock, an often-overriding factor to consider when it comes to investing is the discount rate, the interest rate used in discounted cash flow analysis to assess the present value of future cash flows. The higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of future cash flows—especially cash flows expected in the more distant future. This can drive down the valuation measured by the price-to-earnings and price-to-cash-flow ratios. An example of how this has impacted alternative energy companies can be seen with First Solar, the stock with the largest weighing in the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. The company's earnings per share more than doubled since 2021. Yet, the price-to-earnings ratio plunged from a high of 48.5 in 2021 to now stand at 14.7.
In general, alternative energy companies are what we call "long duration" stocks, meaning they are expected to deliver a higher proportion of their cash flows in the more distant future. As we continue to point out, short duration, or companies with more immediate cashflows, has been the place to be. We wrote about how investors can hedge rising interest rates when the 10-year yield had just ticked over 2.5%. One and a half years later the 10-year yield is over 4.5%. Since then, short duration stocks have provided four times the return of the market.
To measure duration for stocks we use the price-to-cashflow ratio—the lower the ratio, the shorter the duration. While short duration stocks underperformed during the few months of bank stress that began in March, they have returned to outperforming the overall market. We believe stocks with low price-to-cashflow ratios remain attractive in this environment of quantitative tightening and lackluster earnings growth.
What led many ESG stocks to give up all their relative gains wasn't policy changes, earnings disappointments, or the cost of oil; it was largely the result of rising interest rates. While higher interest rates may maintain the unattractive environment for ESG stock performance in the near term, should interest rates begin to decline it is possible alternative energy stocks could regain their lost luster for investors.
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.
Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author's views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author's opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions.
All corporate names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.
Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets.
Investing in emerging markets may accentuate this risk.
The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.
Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy.
Commodity-related products carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Commodity-related products may be extremely volatile, may be illiquid, and can be significantly affected by underlying commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations, and economic conditions.
Because environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies exclude some securities, ESG-focused products may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as products that do not use such strategies. Additionally, the criteria used to select companies for investment may result in investing in securities, industries or sectors that underperform the market as a whole.
Futures, and Futures options trading involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors. Please read the Risk Disclosure Statement for Futures and Options prior to trading futures products. Forex trading involves leverage, carries a substantial level of risk and is not suitable for all investors. Please read the NFA Booklet Trading Forex: What Investors Need to Know prior to trading forex products. Futures and forex accounts are not protected by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). Forex accounts do not receive a preference in any bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to Part 190 of the CFTC's regulations. Additional CFTC and NFA futures and forex public disclosures for Charles Schwab Futures and Forex LLC can be found here. Futures, futures options, and forex trading services provided by Charles Schwab Futures and Forex LLC. Trading privileges subject to review and approval. Not all clients will qualify. Forex accounts are not available to residents of Ohio or Arizona.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For additional information, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions.
The MSCI World Energy Index is designed to capture the large and mid cap performance across 23 Developed Markets countries for all securities classified in the Energy sector as per the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®).
The MSCI Global Alternative Energy Index is designed to capture performance in both developed and emerging market large, mid and small cap companies that derive 50% or more of their revenues from products and services in Alternative Energy.
The S&P Global Clean Energy Index is designed to measure the performance of companies in global clean energy-related businesses from both developed and emerging markets, with a target constituent count of 100.
Income is evolving, is your portfolio? Join industry experts as they dive into fixed income markets and a range of income strategies. Register for our next symposium, October 27 at 11 am ET. Click here.