Unlock Alpha in Mid-Market Private Equity

Frank Burke Jack GrayAdvisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Private equity has been a powerful source of alpha generation and growth, and many portfolios diversify into the asset class. Middle market private equity (“MMPE”), in particular, has historically been under-analyzed and underexplored regarding its opportunity set, leading to mispricing and undervaluation on investable companies. This is especially true in comparison to the large-cap positions found within the more familiar funds from the big-brand PE managers.

MMPE also offers several key advantages related to large-cap private equity, such as price discovery, alpha generation, and the ability to capture growth in niche markets. Additionally, MMPE faces fewer operational challenges, such as slower exit cycles, giving it a distinct advantage.

The number of midmarket companies is vast compared to large-cap companies, with around 200,000 midmarket businesses in the United States, and another 230,000 in the European Union. That massive midmarket represents about one-third of U.S. private sector GDP. With such a large range of companies, industries, and niche opportunity sets that wouldn’t be actionable for large-cap investors, MMPE is able to generate enhanced returns through valuation discounts, value add, and more versatility with regard to entry and exit.

The size of the deals in private equity is extremely important for investment returns. In fact, there is an inverse relationship between deal size and returns in private equity. Typically, managers find it easier to create value within these small companies compared to larger, more established ones. Invested capital in smaller companies results in more significant changes to the company, as opposed to investing in a larger business with a limited growth ceiling where the investment enacts less meaningful changes. That said, while small deals can have the highest average returns, they also have the potential to carry significantly more risk and volatility.

For example, in top quartile funds from 1992-2022, the internal rate of return (IRR), a key measure of the fund’s profitability, was 7.9% and 9.5% for mega- and large-funds, but 14.6% and 24.8% for mid- and small-size funds respectively.1 Further, the average spread, or difference between quartile 1 and quartile 3, is only 10.3% and 16.2% for mega- and large-funds, while the spread of mid- and small-size funds are 16.7% and 21.6% respectively. This data, displayed in the graphs below, highlights how smaller funds have greater return potential, but larger funds have more consistent and predictable spreads and volatility.2 (PPB calculations based on raw data pulled from Preqin Pro.)

average