ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles

Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles

Most Popular Commentaries

More by the Same Author

Alternative Investments
   Hedge Funds
Surprising Choices in the Search for Safety
Near-Certain Loss of Purchasing Power
versus Short-Term Volatility?
By Jason Petitte, CFA
December 4, 2012

Go to page 2, 3, 4, Next     Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF   Remind Me Later

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Risk, in its many guises, is unavoidable, and investors today are taking on significant amounts of credit risk, duration, and leverage to obtain high yields from many presumably safe bonds.  But certain types of risk are often mispriced.  By overweighting one’s portfolio to those sectors that currently offer attractive risk-adjusted returns, investors will be better positioned to meet their long-term goals.

Since the stock market bottomed in March of 2009, through the end of this past August, bond mutual funds have experienced net inflows of about $900 billion, while stock mutual funds saw net outflows of almost $200 billion. During the same period, the S&P 500 returned 123.8% (including reinvested dividends), while a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond purchased at the very bottom of the market, on March 9, 2009, earned a relatively meager 22.5%, even as interest rates fell to generational lows.

This seemingly poor asset-allocation decision on the part of many investors should come as no surprise – investors have shown an uncanny propensity over many decades for buying high and selling low. Given that yields would have to turn negative for a 10-year Treasury bond purchased today to replicate its performance of the last few years going forward, it is difficult to explain why this trend toward bonds has accelerated over the past 12 months.

The most common explanation is that investors are more risk averse than ever after having lived through the financial crisis, the flash crash, and the continuing bombardment of bad news coming from the eurozone. While likely an accurate explanation for investor’s behavior, it’s completely inadequate as a justification, because it ignores two crucial facts: all investors, even those in cash, are taking risk in some form, and all investors need to earn a high enough return on their assets to allow them to meet their goals. Buying a 10-year US Treasury at a 1.70% yield clearly won’t provide sufficient return for the vast majority of investors, so investors should be asking themselves, “Which type of risk am I comfortable taking in order to meet my goals?”

Go to page 2, 3, 4, Next

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company