Letters to the Editor
March 3, 2009


Next page     Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF


The following letter is in response to our article last week, The Case for the All-Bond Portfolio.  See Hildy and Stan Richelson’s response to this letter here.

 

Dear Editor,

Sure, an all bond portfolio works great when you initiate it during a period of double-digit nominal interest rates. The table below demonstrates that long-term Treasury bonds have meaningfully outperformed both the S&P 500 and the Wilshire 5000 for each of the periods listed (thru 2/23/2009).

 

Returns
Since:

Wilshire 5000

S&P 500

LT Treasury

AVG Equity
Premium

 

Annual-
ized

Total

Annual-
ized

Total

Annual-
ized

Total

Annual-
ized

Total

Jan 1 1980

9.84%

1542.46%

10.10%

1652.94%

10.30%

1740.11%

-0.33%

-8.18%

Jan 1 1981

9.08%

1153.93%

9.38%

1247.47%

10.82%

1802.64%

-1.59%

-33.39%

Jan 1 1982

9.58%

1198.89%

9.95%

1312.06%

11.27%

1812.78%

-1.51%

-30.74%

Jan 1 1983

9.25%

1009.93%

9.53%

1079.48%

10.25%

1281.35%

-0.86%

-18.47%

Jan 1 1984

8.72%

817.98%

9.04%

880.81%

10.62%

1264.39%

-1.74%

-32.82%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1.21%

-24.72%

 

But what about today? Thirty-year Treasuries yield just 3.5%, while the average S&P 500 company has a return on equity of better than 8% (even in a depressed economy). The equity premium will reappear at some point. Otherwise our economy is kaput!

The Richelsons are typical rear-view mirror investors.

Charlie Smith
Fort Pitt Capital Group, Inc.

Pittsburgh, PA

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .