Print Page    Email Article    
 

Cambridge Advisors, Inc.

No Oil Recession

June 10, 2008


 

 

When it comes to making good investment decisions, many times main stream media can be your worst enemy.  In times of wide spread mania it is always prudent to apply some common sense and in this case simple math to the headline stories.  As you will see below the numbers do not always support what is being reported in the headlines.  The following is a report from an economist we follow, and his perspective on whether high oil prices will translate into a recession for the U.S. economy.  Brian Wesbury and his team do a commendable job of helping us keep a clear perspective on current economic data and its impact on our economy. 

 

Please take a few minutes to review the short article below, and as always please feel free to call or email me with any questions or comments you might have.

 

 

 

Justin S. Anderson, MBA, AAMS

Portfolio Manager

Cambridge Advisors Inc.

17330 Wright Street, Suite 205

Omaha, NE 68130

402-697-1166

janderson@cambridgeadvisors.net

 

 

Monday Morning Outlook

No Oil Recession To view this article, Click Here
Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist
Robert Stein, CFA - Senior Economist

Date: 6/9/2008

The price of oil jumped $11 per barrel last Friday (a record daily dollar amount), after a $5 move on Thursday. For perspective; just seven short years ago, in 2001, oil was trading at about $20/barrel.

 

The spike in oil was due to a confluence of factors. A senior Israeli official suggested an attack on Iran – to prevent the latter country from acquiring nuclear weapons – was a possibility. The European Central Bank raised the specter of a rate hike, which hurt the dollar, especially after the unemployment rate jumped to 5.5%, possibly pushing any Fed rate hikes further off into the future.

 

A re-ignited oil price has re-energized the outlook for recession from some analysts. Despite avoiding one so far, these analysts are convinced that a teetering consumer will be pushed over the edge by $4 gasoline.

 

The problem with this theory is that when you go through the math there is much less there than initially meets the eye. According to the US Department of Energy, our country imports (net of a very small amount of exports) about 10 million barrels of crude oil per day.

 

At the current price of $138/barrel, the US will spend $425 billion more per year for imported oil, compared to what we would have spent if the price were still at the average $21/barrel that prevailed in 2001: (10 million barrels * 365 days * ($136 - $21)) =  approx. $425 billion.     

 

This is a great deal of money, and it is money that US citizens or companies would keep if the price of oil had not gone up. However, it is still a small amount of the resources that the US economy produces.  In fact, first quarter 2008, total US output (GDP) was running at an annualized $14.2 trillion; or $4.1 trillion more than it was in 2001. And personal income is $3.4 trillion higher this year than it was in 2001. In other words, the US consumer has roughly $3 trillion more in income to spend this year than it did in 2001, even after subtracting the higher cost of imported fuel.

 

Some may say that imports are only part of the energy story, and this is true. But money US consumers spend on domestic energy is income to other US citizens who produce or distribute energy products.

 

This is why rising oil prices are not the major cause of recessions. A careful look at history shows that excessively tight monetary policy caused recession in 1974, 1980, 1990, and 2001. Yes energy prices climbed in each of those instances, but tight money was the true cause of the contraction. This explains how energy prices, which have been on the rise for over five years now, have yet to undermine economic growth.

 

Federal Reserve policy is still highly accommodative and productivity is still strong. These two factors alone are enough to keep the economy expanding in the months ahead, despite the massive jump in oil prices.

This information contains forward-looking statements about various economic trends and strategies. You are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and actual results could be materially different. There are no guarantees associated with any forecast and the opinions stated here are subject to change at any time and are the opinion of the individual strategist. Data comes from the following sources: Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Federal Reserve Board, and Haver Analytics. Data is taken from sources generally believed to be reliable but no guarantee is given to its accuracy.

(c) Cambridge Advisors, Inc.

www.cambridgeadvisors.net

Print Page    Email Article
 
Contact Us